How do you imagine the second amendment will be relevant in fifty years??? Help !?

1 answer:

4 0

Time will tell the relevance of the Second Amendment in 50 years. Nobody will know what will occur in 50 years, whether there will still be humanity left or not. However, we can always be sure of one thing. For as long as there will be the United States, and so long as the nation is not in turmoil, we can safely assume that the 2nd Amendment will be as relevant as ever. The 2nd Amendment is what guarantees each of the other rights that the American citizens hold. Without the 2nd Amendment, the government, especially under Democratic leadership, will completely take control of each and every citizens lives, and will turn this place into not only a totalitarian communism, but destroy the livelihood of all of us. Without the relevance and us taking direct action to keep the 2nd Amendment relevant, we will soon see a degradation of the quality of life for not only ourselves, but the generations to follow.

You might be interested in

What are some of the reconstruction policies agreed-upon by the southern states?

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

they toke control during this time

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Describe the connections between the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the Japanese internment.

Len [333]

Many people feared the presence of Japanese spies after Japan had attacked Pearl Harbor.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Richard morris hunt's griswold house, built in 1863, was designed in the short-lived ____ style. its exterior treatment resemble

Karolina [17]

Richard morris hunt's griswold house, built in 1863, was designed in the short-lived Renaissance style. Its exterior treatment resembled an assemblage of matchsticks with many turrets, gables, and dormers. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.

6 0

3 years ago

Indonesia is home to more than 300 ethnicities. True False

sweet [91]

The answer is true................

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

At the beginning of the Constitutional Convention, the delegates agreed on a set of rules. One

loris [4]

Answer:

A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other

D. It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public

Explanation:

A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other

[] With the secrecy rule, the delegates could speak openly since this would not reach the public. It helped to let them make decisions since there was less pressure from the public (ties into option D).

D. It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public

[] If the public didn't know what was going on, they could not pressure

The second and third options do not make sense because the delegates wanted everyone to attend (they also wanted the votes to be as unanimous as possible) and they were not planning specific military strategies at this time.

Have a nice day!

I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly.

- Heather

8 0

2 years ago