1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mama L [17]
3 years ago
7

The CEO of a large corporation is against a raise of corporate taxes that would cut into his profits. He is most likely to argue

which of the following to support his position?
History
2 answers:
Olegator [25]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

That corporate taxes will force them to hire lesser employees

Explanation:

Those who oppose raising corporate taxes tend to argue that  profit that being cut down by taxes can actually be used by company to hire worker's salary.  Meaning that they associate raising corporate taxes lead to unemployment.

This statement contradicts various studies that being done by several well known establishments. One of them was a study conducted by New York University study in 2014. The study  found the increasing corporate tax rate didn't really affect employment creation,  unless those tax cuts were offered during economic recessions.

ozzi3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

With lower taxes, his business will be able to grow and hire more people, helping the economy

Explanation:

i took the test

You might be interested in
Which sections shown in the map above merged together in 1948 to support democracy in Germany?
Tatiana [17]
Is there anything else? like a picture or options ?
7 0
4 years ago
How did European actions during the Age of Exploration affect both Africa and the Americas similarly?
NARA [144]
<span>Europeans caused populations to decline severely in both places</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the U.S. Revolution and the South American Revolution.
harina [27]

They’re both very different and two different wars

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the 1868 constiution rejected by the voters?
Rina8888 [55]

The Constitution of the State of Mississippi, also known as the Mississippi Constitution, is the governing document for theU.S. state of Mississippi. It describes and enumerates the structures and functions of the Mississippian state government and lists the rights and privileges that are held by the state's residents and citizens. It was adopted on November 1, 1890.

Throughout its existence as a U.S. state, Mississippi has had four state-level constitutions. The first one was created in 1817, upon Mississippi's ascension from a U.S. territory to that of a U.S. state. It was used until 1832, when the second constitution was created and adopted to end property ownership as a prerequisite for voting, which was limited to white men in the state at the time. The third constitution, adopted in 1868 and ratified the following year, was the first Mississippian constitution to be approved and ratified by the people of the state at large and bestowed state citizenship to all of the state's residents, namely newly freed slaves. The fourth constitution was adopted in November 1890 and was created by a convention consisting mostly of Democratsin order to prevent the state's African American citizens from voting. The provisions preventing them from voting were repealed in 1975, after the United States Supreme Court in the 1960s had ruled them to have violated the tenets of the Constitution of the United States.

The current Mississippian state constitution has been amended and updated several times in the more than twelve decades since its original adoption in November 1890, with some sections being changed or repealed altogether. The most recent modification to have been made to the state's constitution occurred in June 2013.


5 0
3 years ago
58 points!!!! and brainlist!!!
denis23 [38]

Answer:

1: By modern standards of international law, no. According to article 1 of the Montevideo Convention a state needs to possess 1) a permanent population, 2) a defined territory, 3) a government, and 4) the capacity to enter into relations with other states.

As a practical matter a state without a government lacks the ability to be represented abroad. Without a government no group is authorized to exercise sovereignty internally. A state without a government cannot interact with, cannot negotiate with, and cannot communicate with other states.

2: I think it means that by nature we are use and need politics. Politics means Politics is the set of activities that are associated with making decisions in groups, or other forms of power relations between individuals, such as the distribution of resources or status. Which means no matter what we use politics to survive.

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The government spends our tax money on:
    6·1 answer
  • Why did more enslaved Africans live in South Carolina than did white people?
    8·1 answer
  • What are some factors that make it more likely that a person will for a certain political party ?​
    13·1 answer
  • How do radical Islamic fundamentalists see the world?
    12·2 answers
  • medical reseach suggests that sufferers of heart disease live longer when they ________ from salty and fatty food.
    8·2 answers
  • What was one of the main reasons Europeans were able to conquer the Aztec empire
    12·2 answers
  • At type of democracy do we have in the United States? *
    12·1 answer
  • What political unit did each of the 13 colonies become following the Revolutionary War?
    10·1 answer
  • The delegates at the convention of 1832 and 1833 wanted Texas and Coahuila to be separate states.
    15·1 answer
  • HELP 10 POINTS
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!