1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Irina-Kira [14]
3 years ago
10

Compare life under the pahlavis with life under ayatollah khomeini. Who benefits most under each system how was the position of

women different?
History
1 answer:
BartSMP [9]3 years ago
6 0

The Pahlavi and the Ayatollah Khomeini regimes were diametrically opposed. The Pahlavi dynasty ruled Iran from 1925 to 1979. The Pahlavi's were closely associated with the West and ruled in an autocratic matter. This was especially true during the Cold War. Thoroughly western in orientation, women enjoyed significant freedoms in terms of their mobility in public life. The Shah's repression of dissidents led to dissatisfaction among students and the religious right. The last Shah of Iran was forced to resign and leave the country. The  Khomeni government represented the ascendancy of the religious rights. Iran became a theocracy and women were increasingly relegated to the margins. They were forced to adhere to religious doctrine, and wear the hijab (Islamic head covering)

You might be interested in
The Swahill language has ties to what other languages?
devlian [24]
Mexican. C. BBC. BBC BBC BBC BBC.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. How did the scientific revolution change the way Europeans understood the natural world?
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:   Transformation in thinking that occurred in the 1500's and 1600's caused by scientific observation, experimentation, and questioning of traditional opinions. It changed the way Europeans looked at the world. What did the Greek astronomer Ptolemy believe? He believed the Earth was the center of the universe.

Explanation:

like if im right

7 0
3 years ago
The term Nisei refers to Japanese Americans who:
uysha [10]
It means to specify children born in a new country to japanese born immigrants. Hope I Helped!
5 0
4 years ago
After the emancipation proclamation the norths main goal was
adoni [48]

Answer:

to end slavery

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
3. Is the minimum wage good or bad for the lowest-paid workers? Explain your reasoning.
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer: This is quite a complicated question and therefore requires quite a complicated and extensive answer.  While it may seem like a minimum wage is good for the lowest-paid workers it isn't very good for an economy and workers as a whole.  The reason for this being is that having a minimum wage and subsequently raising it (as is being done throughout the United States) boosts inflation meaning the price for products rises, (essentially negating all benefits that the workers received from a higher minimum wage.)  Now while the lowest class workers don't really receive any benefit from this as their wage goes up but the products they produce also go up in price as well, but the average middle class consumer gets hit hard by this as their product prices raise but they still have the same wage.  Another downside to having a minimum wage and having it consistently rising is that companies are forced to cut employees or not hire any more people all together.  This is why jobless claims rise after wages rise.  Companies cannot afford to pay workers a higher minimum wage and keep all their workers at the same time otherwise they would go in the red.  This forces them to make cuts in staffing.  Minimum wage would mandate that even if a potential worker and company agree on a price to pay for their work, the law would mandate that this would not be a possibility essentially making work harder to find.  Minimum wage should not even really be needed as companies and workers should be able to find a good and fair price for work on their own without the governments help.  If a worker doesn't like the wage they are receiving then they can quite and find a better paying job.  This also boosts competition among businesses as they are all fighting for workers to fill their jobs and would also raise the wage, but in a natural process without all the detriments that artificially raising the minimum wage brings.  Companies should be allowed to hire workers at whatever pay per hour they so what as long as it is agreed to as well by the worker.  This means that more jobs are open to a more wide variety of people and that also means that if people want to work for less they can still be open to that opportunity as well.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • AIRPLANES:
    14·1 answer
  • Which factor does not limit the influence of the media?
    5·2 answers
  • Need Help ASAP!!. Please Help Me!.
    13·1 answer
  • Many people moved to cities was this before the agricultural revolution
    8·1 answer
  • How does Chinatown show Chinese architecture?
    14·1 answer
  • Which phrase describes runoff <br> Underground water that flows into lakes
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I WILL MARK BRAINLIST
    15·1 answer
  • What aspect of english goverment did not influence leaders in the united states?
    6·1 answer
  • How has the way the Speaker of<br> the House works changed over time?
    10·1 answer
  • . What population trends changed in Venezuela in the mid 1900s?​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!