1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
3 years ago
6

Who has the final over all military matters?

History
2 answers:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
6 0
I looked in my book and found that <span>In the United States, the president, as Commander-in-Chief, has final control over the military, although the Congress retains an important measure of control through the budget process. so its the same thing as she said...</span>
shepuryov [24]3 years ago
3 0
<span>In the United States, the president, as Commander-in-Chief, has final control over the military, although the Congress retains an important measure of control through the budget process.</span>
You might be interested in
Which are individual rights guaranteed to US citizens? Check all that apply.
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

the right to speak freely

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The colonial legislator and governor often held different opinions. This was because the legislator represented the interests of
Mice21 [21]

Answer:

Blank 1: British colonists

Blank 2: British King

Explanation:

Legislators represented the colonists of their colonies while the governor was appointed by the British king.

5 0
3 years ago
What was uncle Henrik explanation In number the stars
Shalnov [3]

Answer: Henrik tells Annemarie that is far easier to be brave when one does not know everything. What he means is that the lack of knowledge about dangerous secrets or impeding threats can help someone keep his/her composure during stressful situations.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the late 1800s, which of the following did the People’s Party believe would give the people more political power?
sveta [45]

Answer: choosing senators through direct election

8 0
3 years ago
What do national and state party organizers have in common
sp2606 [1]

A few things NAtional and State Party organizers have in common are that they both help organize and help other people. The only difference is that one is nationa and the other is Party, like Democratic and Republicans.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • how did the idea of the Manifest Destiny help push the expansion of the United States into Oregon, California, and the former Me
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the relationship between the industrial revolution and urbanization in Great Britain?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following two statements describe benefits of bitcenology in medicine
    10·1 answer
  • How did European influence in Africa expand?
    10·2 answers
  • What is advertising used for? check all that apply ​
    15·2 answers
  • Why was the case Plessy v. Ferguson important?
    15·2 answers
  • Did the Southern colonies or Middle colonies have more religious freedom? ​
    6·1 answer
  • Why did southern cities grow more slowly than Northern cities
    9·2 answers
  • Why were the Aztecs such a powerful empire
    10·1 answer
  • After the Fall, man was still under the cultural
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!