Answer: A transitional figure, Irving somewhat ironically contributed to America's literary independence while producing work that was distinctively European in content and style. Like his contemporary James Fenimore Cooper, Irving proved that Americans could write European literature as well as Europeans could
Explanation:
You can let your imagination flow and don't forget to add support to your answer.
Answer:
In the aftermath of murdering an elderly man, the narrator tries to prove his own sanity. The untrustworthy narrator states that he adored the old guy but was tormented by his "evil eye," which he claims drove him to murder.
Explanation:
just for an add on you could say that the moral was that we should not commit crimes because, in the end, our own sense of guilt will expose us.
PS: you better give me brainliest that story was scary ヘ(꒪◊꒪ヘ)
Think about what a claim is. a claim is something that you state, even if you don't have proof. choice C is a fact, not a claim--it would be used as evidence to support a claim, but it doesn't serve as a claim itself.
i would say that B is the most appropriate claim to argue that people should be more nutritionally knowledgeable. choice D is almost a counterargument, in a sense, because it lists a flaw with food labels. choice A is a statement, but it can be proven with evidence--one could look at a food label to search for the listed items.
