The role that political
machines serve in cities was to satisfy
voter needs and making the bosses wealthy.
<span>A </span>political machine<span> is a </span>political<span> organization
in which an authoritative boss or small group commands the support of a corps
of supporters and businesses (usually campaign workers), who receive rewards
for their efforts.</span>
The correct answer between all the choices given is the last
choice or letter E. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and
it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free
to ask another question.
North Korea, Cuba and communist society have a key feature, a command economy. Moving to a mixed economy would involve less government market control. United States and United Kingdom are examples of Mixed economies.
The political party that formed around Washington and Hamilton in the 1790s was called the Federalist Party. The Federalists believed in a strong central government. The opposing party, the Democratic-Republicans which was formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, believed in more power to the states.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Tax reform
Explanation:
Abolitionism had people like Stowe and Tubman backing it.
Women's suffrage (literally Women's suffrage)
Temperance movement resulted from many women's frustration with their husbands being absolute drunkards.
Laws passed through congress have a direct impact on the court system, since it changes the way courts have to rule on the law. The Supreme court allows the court system to have some say in what laws are just by appealing their agreement with the constitution. The President doesn't directly pass laws, he has the power to veto congressional laws and through his endorsement behind them, but doesn't actually have the power to write, create or pass new laws himself, even if he's the one who technically signs them into law. As such, the supreme court checks the president less often than congress, because the president's actions affect the court's sphere of interest less often. Most interaction between the president and the court happen when the President heavily endorses a bill, gets it passed through congress, and then the court checks it. Some great examples are the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the National Recovery Administration, which were created through bills sponsored by Franklin Roosevelt as part of his New Deal reforms. The court struck them down as unconstitutional for various reasons, much to the dismay of FDR. In modern times, Obamacare almost had it's individual mandate requirement stuck down by the court a few years ago and elements of President Trump's muslim travel ban were struck down by the supreme court just in the last month.
