1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sesenic [268]
3 years ago
10

Which one of the following statements concerning whole life insurance is false? Group of answer choices Whole life insurance pre

miums paid throughout the insured’s lifetime are ordinary life policies. Level-premium whole life insurance accumulates a cash value that eventually reaches the face value of the policy at age 100 - 120. Whole life insurance offers permanent protection throughout the insured’s lifetime. Whole life insurance can be participating, which means the insured must participate in selfdirected investments for the cash value.
Business
1 answer:
Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Whole life insurance can be participating, which means the insured must participate in self-directed investments for the cash value

Explanation:

Insurance is a form of protection against kinds of loss.

whole life insurance is an insurance policy that allows a lifetime coverage, which means the other insurance is for lifetime and not a specific given time provided that the person continues to pays his/premium. It should be noted that Whole life insurance offers permanent protection throughout the insured’s lifetime and premiums are paid throughout the insured’s lifetime.

You might be interested in
Precision Camera Services started the year with total assets of​ $120,000 and total liabilities of​ $40,000. The company is a so
eimsori [14]

Answer:

$125,000

Explanation:

Opening values of;

Total assets =​ $120,000

Total liabilities = $40,000

Total equity = $120,000 - $40,000 = $80,000

During the year,

Total revenues = $140,000

Total expenses = $50,000

Withdrawal by owner = $45,000

The amount withdrawn by the owner reduces the owners equity. This may be deducted from the net income.

Net income from the year = $140,000 - $50,000 - $45,000

                                           = $45,000

This will be added to the opening owner's equity to get the closing owner's equity.

Owner's equity at the end of the​ year = $80,000 + $45,000  

                                                               = $125,000

3 0
3 years ago
Bonita is considering changing jobs and plans to roll over the vested portion of her qualified retirement plan into either an IR
jasenka [17]

Answer:

a) II only

Explanation:

Bonita is planning to join the new company because there is an availability of getting a loan from the company. Unlike her previous employer, the new employer has different packages for employees such as retirement plans as well as the available of loans for employee. Therefore, it can be concluded that the correct option is a.

6 0
3 years ago
International investors pulled their funds out of Asia and moved them into mostly the United States. Using the large open econom
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Policy impact will be positive

Explanation:

When investors pull out their funds from Asian, it will amount to scarcity of funds for developmental purposes. The contrary is the case when such funds are plunged into the US market. Its impact to the economy include:

1. Create more opportunity for development

2. Reduces the interest rate of lending in the society

3. Exchange rate value will decrease just because more of these funds will be used for business transactions

4. The prices of goods will be adjusted to balance the different caused by inflation

7 0
3 years ago
A positive value for PVGO suggests that the firm has: A) A positive return on equity. B) A positive plowback ratio. C) Investmen
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer: c) investment opportunities with superior returns.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The opportunity cost of producing corn in New Zealand is approximately tons of millet, and the opportunity cost of producing cor
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

2 tons of millet for New Zealand and 3 tons of millet for Brazil.

Explanation:

New Zealand and brazil both can produce corns and millet. The opportunity cost for Brazil is more than the New Zealand. Both the countries should go towards the production of the crop in which they have comparative advantage. New Zealand has comparative advantage in producing millet and Brazil has comparative advantage in producing corn.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • __________ implements a security policy that specifies who or what may have access to each specific system resource and the type
    15·1 answer
  • Since investors tend to dislike risk and like certainty, the more volatile a stock, the less valuable will be an option to purch
    7·1 answer
  • The cover letter should _____. a. be a minimum of two pages in length b. never ask for an interview c. introduce you to an emplo
    8·2 answers
  • Barnett Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The
    13·1 answer
  • The liquidity trap refers to the
    14·1 answer
  • Please help
    8·1 answer
  • if an insurance company makes a statement that its policies are guaranteed by the existence of the Insurance Guaranty Associatio
    14·1 answer
  • Croissants Corporation and Donuts Company transfer their assets to Edibles Inc., which manages the assets and distributes the pr
    10·1 answer
  • In Western culture, when you borrow ideas and words from other sources, you must cite them properly. Well-documented data from s
    9·1 answer
  • When zoning deprives the owner of all economic value of her property, it will be categorized be scrutinized under the constituti
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!