.1325to the nearest hundreths

2 answers:

8 0

Really? its .1000 it goes like this "1" is the tenths the "3" is the hundredths the "2" the thousands "5" ten-thousands<span />

Rama09 [41]3 years ago

4 0

0.1325 to the nearest hundredths is 0.13. Because the thousandths place isn't 5 or more 3 stays the same.

You might be interested in

Describe how the graph of the function is related to the graph of its parent function.

SashulF [63]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The -2 reflects across the x -axis

The + 1 shifts it up one unit

6 0

2 years ago

A turtle is 20 5/6 inches below the surface of the pond. It dives to a depth of 32 1/4. What is the change of the turtles posist

BartSMP [9]

Answer:

I believe it's 11

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry if I'm wrong

4 0

3 years ago

Can the values be added or subtracted? If one value needs to be converted to another, describe the conversion.

vaieri [72.5K]

Okie, the terms are similar in that they both have inches, but they are in different forms. The first has inches to the 2nd power. This is a unit for area. The second has the units of inches to the 3rd power. This is a unit of volume. To convert from area to volume, you would need a conversion but it usually would be from a problem with certain values. Ex. Think of a cube, the 2 sides multiplied would be area and third multiplied in would be volume. If you are adding an area to a volume, you would need to know of which since you cannot change volume magically to area or area magically to volume if you do not know the details of the problem. The answer is A; I hope this helps :-)

8 0

3 years ago

2 3/16 as a decimal Express

mestny [16]

The answer is 2.1875

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An urban planner is researching commute times in the San Francisco Bay Area to find out if commute times have increased. In whic

Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The urban planner collects travel times from a random sample of 125 commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area. A traffic Study from last year claimed that the average commute time in the San Francisco Bay Area is 45 min. The urban planner will see if there is evidence the average commute time is greater than 45 minutes

( Here in this case, Null hypothesis will be Η :μ = 45

And the Alternate Hypoyhesis will be H, :μ> 45 )

C. The urban planner asks a random Sample of 100 commuters in the San Francisco Bay Area to record travel times on a Tuesday morning. One year later, the urban planner asks the same 100 commuters to record travel times on a tuesday morning . The urban planner will see the difference in commute time shows an increase.

Here in this case the null hypothesis will be, H₀ : $\mu _d$ = 0

And the Alternate Hypothesis will be H, : $\mu _d$ <0 The commute time after 1 year is more

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers