Let’s start from the beginning. In order to tell an event, you have to read about it. The minute a human reads a story, he/she starts to take a side. It is a natural instinct. Then when telling the historical event, that idea of picking sides somehow crawls up to the surface in disguise of personal thoughts and “I think this” statements. The only way a true unbiased historical reference can be obtained is to simply go back in time to see it in person. But wait that’s impossible, so no. The answer is no.
<span>Earth won't always be fit for occupation. We know that in two billion years or so, an expanding sun will boil away our oceans, leaving our home in the universe uninhabitable—unless, that is, we haven't already been wiped out by the Andromeda galaxy, which is on a multibillion-year collision course with our Milky Way. Moreover, at least a third of the thousand mile-wide asteroids that hurtle across our orbital path will eventually crash into us, at a rate of about one every 300,000 years.</span>
The Arab-Israeli war had such an impact on regular Palestinians that many of them evacuated their homes during the conflict, while others were moved to refugee camps.
<h3>What actually transpired during the Arab-Israeli war?</h3>
The Arab-Israeli war was a nightmare for Palestinians, who were forced to flee their homes and leave their lands as the conflict intensified.
Regular Palestinians were forced to relocate soon after the conflict ended, leaving their homelands in refugee camps. They had been invaded by the British and had lost their own lands.
As a result of the Arab-Israeli war, regular Palestinians were forced to flee their homes and were moved to refugee camps. Thus, options A and B are correct.
Learn more about Arab-Israeli War here:
brainly.com/question/3447850
Answer:
Today's Muslim world is beyond the periscope of Muslim majority societies and rather inclusive of the ever growing Muslim communities in the West. The ongoing predicaments in the Muslim societies might though be contemporary but inextricable from the bequeathed European legacies in these societies. Although, European formal administration of the Muslim world is past historical reality, nonetheless, should Europe take responsibility for the happenings in the Muslim world? In the post-Cold War era, how much similarities and dissimilarities can be drawn in the EU and the US foreign policies and actions towards the Muslims. The post 9/11 developments indicate visible signs of approaches and opinions in the EU countries towards some of the issues of the Muslim World – more so in the case of Palestine, Iraq Syria and Iran – ostensibly independent of Washington. Should the European gestures be taken as goodwill and pragmatism or other side of the coin in the US foreign policy? Would there be any degree of correlation between affairs of European Muslims and the larger Muslim societies? The need for greater mutual understanding between the EU and the Muslim countries as well as the OIC, is evident.
Explanation:
Limiting the fees that the railroad charged for