was the trial of tears necessary to advance civilization as president Jackson said, or a cruel injustice to the cherokee

2 answers:

7 0

This question is asking more of an opinion than a fact, but there is more evidence to support that it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee people. President Jackson violently forced native Americans out of their homes and sent them away, even though the supreme court had previously ruled against him doing this. He disobeyed the Constitution when he chose to set forth in continuing the Trail of Tears and it was very likely he did not feel guilty about doing it either.

kaheart [24]3 years ago

3 0

This would depend on your beliefs. Personally, I believe it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee, and that the Trail of Tears was nowhere near necessary to advance civilization. However, this question is asking for your point of view on the matter. Using the information you have learned, reflect on the event and come to your own conclusion. Hope this helped! ^.^

You might be interested in

after world war1, how did japan become a dominant power, producing advanced weaponry the compete with western nations

lukranit [14]

<span>They became an industrialized nation with military leaders coming to power. </span>

6 0

3 years ago

ANSWER QUICK Please

Nat2105 [25]

1. Julius Caesar conquered Gaul

8 0

3 years ago

Which of the following actions has NO impact on your credit score?

Andrej [43]

When you inquire about a credit card charge, then it has no impact on your credit score. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option . Nowhere around the world can there be any rules that can deduct the credit rating of a person for inquiring about a credit card charge. It would be absolutely ridiculous.

I did some research and this what they say

Hope its help ;)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The social security act of 1935 established a kind of _____ for americans.

madreJ [45]

It was a safety net against poverty for people over the age of 65, as well as being a welfare system for disabled people.

4 0

3 years ago

How was the new government of the United States similar to the government under British rule

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

The official British reply to the colonial case on representation was that the colonies were “virtually” represented in Parliament in the same sense that the large voteless majority of the British public was represented by those who did vote. To this Otis snorted that, if the majority of the British people did not have the vote, they ought to have it. The idea of colonial members of Parliament, several times suggested, was never a likely solution because of problems of time and distance and because, from the colonists’ point of view, colonial members would not have adequate influence.

8 0

2 years ago