Unity? Unification? Agreement? Are there options to answering the question?
Answer:
visualizing, taking notes, and making examples compared to your life
Explanation:
Answer:
The new owners of the land where our trees grow seems not to want us around our trees anymore. But we do not cause any trouble and the trees are really ours even though the land now belongs to them.
Maybe, we just have to sell the trees to them as they have requested from the Don. The Don knows better, and he advised we sell it to them as they are good people. We will go back to our lands and leave the trees to them. But we are really going to miss playing and having fun around our trees again. I hope we find another playground soon enough.
Explanation:
Since the children only really played around the trees that we're really theirs, it would be quite confusing to them when the new landowners do not welcome their presence. It would also take sometime for them to finally get over not going to the trees again even after they might have reluctantly sold the trees.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Yes, the Card Criminal Syndicalism Act outlawing the expression of revolutionary political views violate the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights.
Under the Bill of Rights, every United States citizen has the right to freely express with respect, although its opinions criticize the government. Exactly that was the intention of the founding fathers of the United State, that people could have freedom of speech to express their concerns or demand certain changes.
Let's have in mind that during the 1910s and 1920s, different state governments enacted criminal syndicalism laws to prohibit workers support their demands. Many people were arrested during that spam for organizing or participating in protests and demonstrations.
