The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
Answer:
After the Civil War, with the protection of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, African Americans enjoyed a period when they were allowed to vote, actively participate in the political process, acquire the land of former owners, seek their own
Explanation:
Answer:
the united states treasury
Explanation:
treasurys usually have to do with money so thats why i picked it
Enlightened despots-absolute monarchs were influenced by enlightenment. Thus they were less than a true reformer.
-Hope it helps :3
Human sacrifice and expansion was the answer because the Aztecs were a feared tribe and conquered many people. They had always practiced human sacrifice and that was one of the reasons that Hernan Cortes had been horrified about. It couldn't have been anything about conquering Mayans because their civilization had died out for some strange reason.
