Answer: B
Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol
Answer:
A
Explanation:
These laws promote vigorous competition and protect consumers from anticompetitive mergers and business practices.
I think it's both the railroad inspector and the driver who drives the car. The railroad inspector didn't come fix the problem and the driver didn't take his car to the shop to get his problem fixed. So honestly, it's both their faults.
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635
