Great Britain and Russia differed in military strategy because Great Britain centered on ground forces, while Russia developed its navy.
<h3>What are the ground forces and navy?</h3>
During World War II, The Army Ground Forces were one of the three independent elements of the Army of the United States, some other existing the Army Air Forces and Army Service Forces.
End-to-end of their existence, Army Ground Forces were the large-scale training organization of all time established in the US and the Great Britain also focus on ground forces as a military strength before World War I.
The US's Navy is the transportation service branch of the US Armed Forces and one of the eight clad services of the US, as a military strength Russia also developed their Navy before the time of World War I.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Learn more about the ground forces and navy, refer to:
brainly.com/question/19863947
US Troops were killed during a conflict.
In the year 1993, the Somalian capital of Mogadishu was raided by American troops.
President Bush had sent the United States forces to go on a mission to provide food to the people of Somalia who were suffering from the civil war.
Thousands of Somalia civilians were starving so the President Bush sent the American on a humanitarian mission.
During a battle two United Nations soldiers and American 18 Americans lost their lives.
read more at brainly.com/question/858688
1 New
2 Boston
3 company
4 <span>governor
</span>5 <span>charter</span>
The difference of opinion and in particular with opposing opinions is a source of much conflict between and among so many religious groups. This derives from the sense of "entitlement" which comes from, in particular, monotheistic beliefs. As one group gathers in belief in one way and one god and that one god's system of rules, it naturally follows that that group will determine by logic, that all opposing beliefs are wrong, and that therefore the other religious groups are wrong in their beliefs. From this can arise conflict when one tries to overpower the other to have a bigger voice or control.
