Answer:
Social forces involved: group relationship
Ethical values involved: honesty, concern and respect for others, responsibility
Explanation:
To begin with, it is important to stand out that Nelson has no right to sue Baker, since Baker is entitled to reject the counteroffer made by Nelson if said offer does not meet his needs. According to contract law, the buyer, Nelson, has the possibility of not accepting the counteroffer. In the case at issue, Nelson did not comply with some ethical values such as "concern and respect for others". Instead of following the correct procedures so as to sell his house, he directly sued Baker. Baker might have felt intimidated by Nelson when he said that he "accepted the offer as amended". There is Nelson's abuse of power. The value of "honesty" has not been respected either, since he sued Baker immediately.
Baker complied with other values such as respect and responsibility, since he followed the procedures fixed for this type of transaction by notifying the other party that he was not accepting the counteroffer.
3. Decides whether a law is constitutional
Answer:
A. The government agreed to temporaily waive tax payments.
Explanation:
Answer:
Editing for content
Explanation:
Vincent is reading over the paper that he has written. He realizes that he went off on a bit of a tangent, and one of his main points does not line up with his thesis statement. This was discovered while Vincent was <u>editing for content</u>.
Editing for content is also known as heavy editing, this type of editing involves checking to see if the content of the write-up is okay and in-line with the topic of interest and any unnecessary content is removed.
I think it’s the second one B
