The statement shows that men and women are alike in many ways yet so different. Or if you want to be funny you could say Men are tails and women are heads because just like in the real world head is something men will never get :))
A. Food. In any other situation it would apply to other, but as it seems they do not eat much food at home, this is their main source of food, it needs to be put there under food.
Based on the principle of <u>one person, one vote</u>, each legislative district must have equal populations.
There are 435 congressional districts from which the respective legislative members are chosen for the US House of Representatives.
Each electoral district is supposed to have an equal population, as much as possible. This was reinstated as a law by the Supreme Court in the case of Reynolds vs. Sims (1964).
brainly.com/question/23815029
Indian told Europeans of glittering empires further west to get rid of the intruders, this explains the conquistadors' conviction that glimmering cities of gold existed in the Americas.
The reason with reference to the conquistadors’ conviction that glimmering towns of gold existed within the people is that the Indians advised Europeans of glittering empires similarly west as a way of having rid of the intruders. The conquistador is known as the squaddies or explorers of the Spanish or Portuguese empire wherein they may be the ones liable for declaring reference the gold that they said to have existed in America.
Conquistadors or conquistadores had been the explorer-soldiers of the Spanish and Portuguese Empires of the 15th and sixteenth centuries. at some stage in the Age of Discovery, conquistadors sailed past Europe to the Americas, Oceania, Africa, and Asia, colonizing and beginning trade routes.
The Spanish conquistadors were essentially sanctioned pirates. Their goal turned into to assert land and assets for their investors and conquer natives of other lands for treasure and glory. Additionally, they had been vital within the unfolding and enforcement of religion.
Learn more about Conquistadors here brainly.com/question/2011143
#SPJ4
Answer: Insufficient external justification; more dissonance
Explanation:
insufficient justification effect:
Describes that in some cases people will go against their own person belief in order to partake in a particular action of behaviour because there is a promise of a small reward versus large reward but reject an activity if it associated with a mild threat versus a sever threat.
Insufficient external justification occurs when a person doesn't have enough justification why they couldn't do something they desired to do.
Cognitive dissonance defines the conflict that exist within someone as they struggle with whether to get involved with the behaviour that goes against their beliefs or attitudes and they may mentally try to adjust their attitudes, behaviour or beliefs in order to establish balance.