Short story by author W. W. Jacobs, first published in England
The point the king is trying to make is, essentially, that while what Hitler did was considered legal and while what the Hungarian Freedom Fighters did was illegal, it is all a matter of human rights. While what Hitler did may have been legal, it was not morally correct to kill 6 million people. And while it was illegal to aid the Jews and provide comfort, it is morally correct to help these people in a time of need, as stated by the golden rule of every religion, do unto others as you would like to have done to you. It is mostly based on what people believe is correct and if certain people believed what Hitler believed, they would not have that certain moral correctness. So in standing up for what you believe in, a change can be made based on the actions; illegal or not.
Explanation:
He had been an expert shikari. He had the hunter's instinct in his very blood and bones. No animal could escape from him. But when his only daughter, Miriam got married and went off to Punjab, he understood the true meaning of love and separation.
Answer:
What claim is the author making in the argument?
Explanation:
Answer: it took about a week to become a scab. Then when ever I would sit in my knee it would hurt. And if u peel the scab u start to bleed. After the scab goes away u sometimes have a scar left.
Explanation:
It’s happened many times to me especially when I started to learn how to ride a bike and a skateboard.
