Regarding the source, we can comment on the following.
- Because you forgot to attach the article, we do not know the content of it. However, we gladly can comment on the following general terms.
- The source of información has to be valid, and you have to cite it in your article.
- The validation of your article depends on the proper primary and secondary sources you cite as part of your arguments.
- That is the reason why the sources for the article influence the content of the article.
- Good sources mean a solid argument and more interest on the part of your readers.
- Bad or questionable sources mean that your article won't have the credibility needed to be accepted.
We conclude that is very important for the writer to include reliable primary and secondary sources in his article to impact the audience.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/336747?referrer=searchResults
The best selection appears to be lower prices for consumers.
It was all due to lack of regulation of the financial sectors, fraud on some energy companies, not enough margin, etc.
Good luck :)
Answer:
The biggest principle that the allies wanted to clean up after Napoleon was legitimacy.
Explanation:
Napoleon was a legitimate, recognized head of state, who everyone except England was allied with at one time or another. As a foreigner, they couldn’t execute the French head of state for acting on behalf of France. To just declare him a criminal and shoot him would have been admitting that the Czar of Russia and Emperor of Austria had been making deals with a criminal.
Also, some of the allies LIKED changes made by Napoleon and wanted to keep it. For example, Kings of the Confederation of the Rhine wanted to keep being Kings, not Grand Dukes or Electors. It was in their interest to not declare Napoleon an outright criminal.
Even the allies holding him on St. Helena wasn’t backed by law. How they were treating Napoleon had no legal precedence. They were making things up as they were going along. The reason why the British would never allow Napoleon to set foot on England was that Napoleon’s supporters would have filed a Habeas Corpus suit on behalf of Napoleon and make the British courts answer what law they were holding Napoleon under.
In the long run it actually played to the advantage of British that Napoleon was alive and under their control. Letting loose Napoleon was the ultimate political trump card they had against the Germans and the French.
The goals of the French Revolution was to write the constitution, ending the absolute power, protecting the individual rights and ending the class system.
<h3>What is French revolution?</h3>
French revolution took place in 1789 in order to make the political and the social changes in the France. It ended the rule of the emperor and the political powers went in the hands of the public. The revolution ended in 1799.
The revolution began because the Louis XVI increased the tax rate for the people of the lower classes. At that period of time french society was divided into 3 estates i.e. nobility, clergy and commoners. Clergy and nobility enjoyed several privileges.
Only the commoners were paying the taxes. Thus french revolution ended the absolute rule, writing a constitution, protecting individual rights and ended the class system.
Learn more about constitution here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ1
