All categories

3 years ago

Research indicates that six-member juries are more likely

Social Studies

1 answer:

lutik1710 [3]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Option C is correct.

Explanation:

Six members are simply not enough to include a wide community or to represent each group within it.

However, research has been made on the difference between a 12 or 6 member jury, and its impact on the final verdict, and it hasn't been noticed any impact in the final result. Although not all the diversity of a community is present in the jury, this can still reach a fair decision.

You might be interested in

Who is at the bottom of the Corporate Structure?

Vilka [71]

Answer:

The lowest level of a corporate hierarchy is the employees.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

If Max ingests a small amount of a drug, he may be livelier and more outgoing at a party. If he then continues to consume more o

MAXImum [283]

Answer:

drug in this case is alcohol

Explanation:

Alcohol is a form of drug known as depressant and cause depression, which can slow down the activity of the nervous system.
Alcohol is a central nervous system depressant drug that gradually inhibits brain function, which in turn impairs the functioning of the central nervous system.
Alcohol is a depressant that also exhibits stimulant effects, which is said to be useful for stimulation when taken in small amounts.
The person acted to be 'alive and more outgoing' at a party, which should be said for excitement, and that the slowing down of the drug was the effect of depression.

5 0

3 years ago

Rules of conduct describing what people ought and ought not to do in various situations are called?

marusya05 [52]

Rules of conduct describing what people ought and ought not to do in various situations are called Morality.

<h3><u>What is morality?</u></h3>

The distinction between proper (right) and improper intentions, decisions, and acts is what is referred to as morality (wrong).
Morality can be a set of rules or guidelines generated from a set of rules of behavior from a specific philosophy, religion, or culture, or it can come from a rule that a person feels ought to be applied to everyone.
Goodness or rightness are more exactly synonyms for morality.
Meta-ethics, which examines abstract concepts like moral ontology and moral epistemology, and normative ethics, which examines more concrete frameworks for forming moral judgments like deontological ethics and consequentialism, are both branches of moral philosophy.

The Golden Rule, which argues that "one should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself," is an illustration of normative ethical philosophy.

Know more about morality with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/27461226

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

A colleague of yours frequently takes for his own personal use small amounts of office supplies, noting that the loss to the com

nika2105 [10]

Answer: Kant’s Categorical Imperative

Explanation:

Kant's categorical imperative expresses that there is an inner force within the human being that is capable of governing his behaviors, that is, that the person can decide which behaviors are moral and which are not. This concept was the basis for the creation of various theories about morality. This concept of Kant falls within the framework of a global law since it understands that regardless of history, morality must be present.

As for the taking of small amounts of office supply, even these not representing a loss for the company are not correct to take them. If these were not given by the company itself, the person should not take them as doing so could be labeled as stealing. Stealing is taking the belongings of a person without their consent and even the object has taken does not represent any importance for a person, it should not be taken without their authorization.

8 0

3 years ago

Give an example of how the United States has handled an international conflict. Did it involve any international organizations?

docker41 [41]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

However, trying to help you, we can say the following.

Usually, the United States has handled international conflict using the force of its military presence worldwide or at least threatening to use it. The exception was the period known as the Cold War, in which the US knew that it cannot directly confront the Soviet Union because the USSR was as militarily powerful as the United States.

During the Cold War Years, both countries competed in the arms race, the space race, and the spread/containment of Communism around the world.

Did it involve any international organizations?

Yes, sometimes, and accordingly with US interests, it has involved the United Nations, but mostly, NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, trying to get the military support of countries such as Great Britain, France, Canada, among others.

3 0

2 years ago