Answer:
Hoover and Roosevelt disagreed fundamentally on how to tackle the Great Depression. Hoover was very much wedded to the prevailing economic orthodoxy, which held that periodic slumps were inevitable and that there was very little that the government could do in terms of direct involvement in the economy. Hoover and Roosevelt disagreed fundamentally on how to tackle the Great Depression. Hoover was very much wedded to the prevailing economic orthodoxy, which held that periodic slumps were inevitable and that there was very little that the government could do in terms of direct involvement in the economy. Your welcome :)
Explanation:
Correct answer choice is :
<h2>B) The display does not violate the clause because it is secular.</h2><h2 /><h3>Explanation:</h3><h3 />
Though the Constitution explicitly prohibits an organized government religion, each year during the holiday season, we see the necessary cooperation between government and religion. Almost every school and classroom has a holiday display, as do most cities. It has been shown that following the holiday season in such a fashion is a form of governmental assistance for religion. The opposite case is that government impartiality does not mean that government must be an hostility toward religion.
Taking into account the following options the one that led to the growth of both Prussia and Austria is D.
(A) The Peace of Westphalia limited the sovereignty of the Holy Roman Empire.
(B) Religion ceased to be a cause for warfare after the Peace of Westphalia.
(C) The disappearance of the plague in the eighteenth century led to a population explosion in Prussia and Austria.
(D) The concept of an effective balance of power developed in central Europe.
I believe the correct answer is D, based on my general knowledge.
Hope I helped. ^ω^
This fear of a strong central government influenced us greatly, in fact, the best source of evidence for this is in our Bill of Rights. The founding fathers abhorred Britain and its harsh policies and they created certain laws to protect US citizens from these things. For instance, the right against quartering soldiers was in direct response to the English Quartering Act which angered most of the colonists at the time. Another right was right to bear arms, which would protect citizens if by any chance the democratic government suddenly became authoritarian or dictator-like.
Nowadays we see how the same could be said about contemporary politics, it seems like more and more each day countries are adopting a limited form of government. THough there are still certain types of governments such as the Cuban and Venezuelan ones that are still in many ways dictatorships, many of these countries have adopted these values with the fear of misrepresenting the individual or returning to a dark past (ex. Germany). This has become especially popular due to the fact that many countries that developed in the 20th century used to be European colonies and just won their independence (creating a fear similar to that of 18th century America).
