1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
9

Find the missing number in this proportion. 10/15 = /21

Mathematics
1 answer:
sveta [45]3 years ago
6 0
Cross multiply

10 x
15 21

15x=210
x=14
You might be interested in
In each bouquet of flowers, there are 5 roses and 8 white carnations. Complete the table to find how many roses and carnations t
Verizon [17]
40 70 is the right answer ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP<br> solve for x
liq [111]

Answer:

29.44

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we know the both the measure of the angle and the adjacent line of the angle, we can use tan to find x.

tan is (Opposite/Adjacent Line)

\tan(31)  =  \frac{x}{49} \\ 49 \tan(31) = x \\  29.44 = x

That is the answer

- Kan Academy Advance

3 0
2 years ago
Nineteen immigrants to the U.S. were asked how many years, to the nearest year, they have lived in the U.S. The data are as foll
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

a) The frequency of the data "<em>15</em>" and "<em>20</em>" is 2 for both, not 1; this means their relative frequency is 2/19 for both, not 1/19; finally, the cumulative relative frequency in the row of the data "15" should be 0.8947, not 0.8421. This error might have happened because someone didn't count the numbers correctly, so they only noticed one "15" and one "20" when, in fact, there were two people that had lived in the U.S. for 15 years, and two more people for 20 years. On the other hand, the error in the cumulative relative frequency happened because it accounted for only one person living in the U.S. for 15 years, instead of two people.

b) Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. from 0 to 5 years, <em>not </em>for 5 years. The cumulative relative frequency in this row (47%) accounts for every data gathered so far, not just the "5 years" row. The correct statement would be that <em>3 out of 19</em>, or 15.8% (relative frequency) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First of all, to avoid errors like the one in the problem's table, <em>we should first place the given numbers from least to greatest</em>, so we can construct a new frequency table by ourselves. Let's do just that, and we'll end up with something like this:

0 , 0, 2 , 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 12, 12 , 15, 15, 20, 20

Now we'll have a much easier time from now on.

2) The second step is to <em>construct the Data and Frequency columns</em>. Just place each unique integer in a new row of the <em>Data </em>column, then count how many times that unique integer was found, and, finally, place that number below the <em>Frequency </em>column (<em>Please refer to the Excel Worksheet provided as an attachment). </em>

Let's do it as follows:

Data     Frequency

0            2

2            3

4            1

5            3

7            2

10           2

12           2

15           2

20          2

<em>Note that we counted "15" and "20" twice! So each one of those rows have a frequency of 2, not 1 as the table presented in the problem suggests. </em>

3) Next, we want to construct the Relative frequency and Cumulative relative frequency columns. For the relative frequency column, <em>we just divide the frequency of each row by the total number of immigrants surveyed, which is 19</em>. For the cumulative relative frequency column, <em>we will get each row's relative frequency, and add the cumulative relative frequency of the row before it</em>. Note that for the first row, the cumulative relative frequency is the same as its relative frequency.

We should get something like this:

Data    Frequency    Relative frequency    Cumulative relative frequency

0            2                   2/19                               0.1053

2            3                   3/19                               0.2632

4            1                    1/19                                0.3158

5            3                   3/19                               0.4737

7            2                   2/19                               0.5789

10           2                   2/19                               0.6842

12           2                   2/19                               0.7895

15           2                   2/19                               0.8947

20          2                   2/19                               1.0000

<em>Note that the relative frequency for both "15" and "20" is 2/19 instead of 1/19! Also, we got a cumulative relative frequency of 0.8947 in the row of "15", instead of 0.8421.</em>

4) a) We have just fixed the error in the table, but we have to <em>explain how someone might have arrived at the incorrect number(s)</em>. The most logical way that someone might have gotten the incorrect frequencies of "15" and "20" is that <em>they didn't count the numbers correctly while building the Frequency column</em>. This could have happened because <em>that person probably didn't order the numbers from least to greatest</em>, as we did in Step 1, which makes it way easier to get the frequency of each data without making a mistake.

5) b) We have now to <em>explain what is wrong with the statement "47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years</em>.

To answer that, we can refer to the relative frequency of the row of the data "5", which tells us that 3 out of 19 (or roughly 15.8%) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years. <em>Relative frequency is telling us the percentage of people that have lived for </em><em>this </em><em>amount of time.</em>

By contrast, <em>the cumulative relative frequency of this same row tells us that </em>0.4737, or roughly 47%, of the people surveyed have lived for 5 years or less. Cumulative relative frequency accounts for the data presented in its row, <em>plus </em>the data presented in the rows before it.

So the correct statement would be either:

  • 15.8% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years, or
  • Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or less.
Download xlsx
7 0
4 years ago
What is 7+2t+3t in its simplest form?
laiz [17]
7+2t+3t is just 7+5t
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
-5=-8-_____ the answer pl help and thank u
kumpel [21]
-5-(-8)= 3 
Hope this was what you were looking for:)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A basketball player shoots a free throw. The number of possible outcomes for this event is
    12·1 answer
  • How do you solve for a:<br> 4b = 2a - t
    13·1 answer
  • What is the length of the actual wing of 2cm = 192 cm
    12·1 answer
  • Please explain your answer.
    14·2 answers
  • Fill in the table using function rule y=2x+5. (1. ) (4. ) (5. ) (10. )​
    9·1 answer
  • What do you think it means when the change is positive? Negative?
    10·1 answer
  • I I need help on this one fast ???
    6·2 answers
  • Two water tanks are leaking. Tank A has leaked 1/16 of a gallon in 1/12 of a minute, and Tank B has leaked 3/60 of a gallon in 1
    14·2 answers
  • A swimming pool has 500 gallons of water in it and is leaking. The change in the amount of water in the pool is -4 gallons per h
    12·1 answer
  • X+2y=8 x-2y=-4 solve by system of equations
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!