So these debates are usually over virtue ethics (basically what you value, how you value things etc.). One debate is between the philosophy of utilitarianism and deontology (consequentialism vs means based). Social problems and issues are often times evaluated under particular values. For (a simple) ex. a utilitarian would value implementing a policy to save the most people whereas a deontologist wouldn’t look to save the most people if it meant infringing on the rights of the individual. So a utilitarian would care more about extinction then the most gruesome possible death of one person. Hope this helps!
1. The rights of a photographer revolve around photographing public activities.
2. An ethical photographer is someone who takes public activities and not private events unless he has permission.
3. The First Amendment talks about the freedom of speech which can cover photography only if there was a message that was going to be conveyed to a certain audience.
4. There should be limits to editorial photographs. Not everyone are prepared to look at certain photographs and understand it.
<span />
Answer:
Explanation:
It allowed families to have a keepsake representation of their fathers or sons as they were away from home. Photography also enhanced the image of political figures like President Lincoln, who famously joked that he wouldn't have been re-elected without the portrait of him taken by photographer Matthew Brady
The root of mortified is death (answer two).
