The answer is $7 because Marginal revenue is the change in total revenue from 10 customers ($400) to 11 customers ($407) How a monopolist maximizes profits
How does a monopolist determine its profit-maximizing level of output How does it determine the price that it charges?
The monopolist will select the profit-maximizing level of output where
MR = MC
and then charge the price for that quantity of output as determined by the market demand curve. If that price is above average cost, the monopolist earns positive profits.
How a monopolist maximizes profits
Because Chuck, a sole commercial airplane operator in small isolated town, has no competition, he has complete control of market price of air travel in his small tone
Reduced price → increase in ticket sales
Monopoly maximizes profit by choosing an amount of profit in which marginal revenue equals marginal cost (MR= MC) Since Chuck must reduce his price to sell more units, he has an incentive to sell a smaller quantity than a perfective competitive company
Learn more about Marginal revenue :
brainly.com/question/10822075
#SPJ4
The primary advantages for most companies entering the realm of franchising are capital, speed of growth, motivated management, and risk reduction
Answer:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Raking 2% interest rate:
1) 10 years
2) 5 years
3) 1 year
Raking 18% interest rate:
1) 1 year
2) 5 years
3) 10 years
Explanation:
You have to apply to bring the amount of money to present value, according with the information, the formula is the next:
Present Value = Future Value/((1+ interest rate)^(n))
Where n is the number of years that you have to wait to receive the money.
You have to calculate every situation with the respective amount of time and interest rate, the result must be money. and when you get the 9 results, you have to compare every situation and chose the higher amount of money according to the interest rate, for example:
Present value = 140/ ((1+10%)^(1))= 127
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 149
= 140/ ((1+10%)^(5))= 135
So the answer for the first scenario with an interest rate of 10% is:
Ranking 10% interest rate:
1) 5 years
2) 10 years
3) 1 year
Answer:
The selling price for Job A is $75,978.00
Explanation:
Molding Finishing Totals
Machine hours 4000 1000 5000
Fixed mnf. overheads 19600 2400 22000
Variable manufacturing
Overheads per machine hours 1.1 2.1
<u> JOB A</u> <u>JOB B</u>
Direct materials 13,600 7500
Direct labour costs 20,700 7400
Molding machines 2700*1.1= 2,970
Finishing 400*2.1= 840
Fixed mnf: molding 19600*4000/5000= 15,680
Fixed mnf: finishing 2400*1000/5000= <u> 480 </u>
Total cost (sum of all the above) $54,270
Mark up = 40%
Mark up=gross profit (GP)*100/cost
40%= GP*100/54270
40*54270/100= GP
GP= 21,708
Sales= cost + GP
Sales= 21,708+54,270
Sales= $75,978.00
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
