Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.
<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>
Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.
Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.
So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.
Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909
Answer:
The term, “statute of limitations” refers to laws that limit that amount of time a person has to bring a lawsuit.
Explanation:
Like just about every other type of legal claim, medical malpractice claims are subject to lawsuit filing deadlines that are set by state law. This kind of law is known as a statute of limitations. The purpose of this article is to help you understand how a medical malpractice claim can be affected by the statute of limitations, and the importance of paying attention to the deadline as it applies to your case.
Answer and Explanation:
Under the Uniform Securities Act, the limited registration provision available to Canadian broker-dealers and their agents permit such broker-dealers to conduct businesses with interested people who reside in Canada; in addition, broker-dealers can also conduct businesses with Canadians who plan to reside in the state on a temporary basis, and whom they were already familiar with, prior to the time they came to the United States.
Answer:
it's weird ... why did it exploded when he got outside ... it's fishy .. he is lying surely he knows about this explosion and he is just telling half story ... we should emotionally manipulate him
Answer:
Double Jeopardy right
Explanation:
This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death
