<u>Answer:</u>
the significance of Greenwood being nicknamed “The Black Wall Street” as B) it signified the financial success of the area
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the early 20th century, the present-day Greenwood Avenue was known as the Black Wall Street for its thriving economy, wholly propelled by the African American community. Under the Dawes Act, 1887 many African-Americans who were former slaves of tribes acquired land in this area. Others migrated to this area, which was now considered a haven for the black community, to escape racial oppression.
OW Gurley and JB Stradford are mainly credited to kick start the economic development of this place. Schools, hotels, furriers, posh restaurants, a library and other establishments of prosperity marked the streets of Greenwood.
New businesses cropped up with assistance from the affluent black community. This ensured that the money so created circulated first within the community. This made Greenwood entirely self-contained, reliant and an economic powerhouse and thus the name- Black Wall Street.
Belgium
King Leopold,who treated the colony as a personal estate. He pushed blacks into forced labor to collect rubber for him, as well as other valuable minerals. unlike other imperial powers, Leopold did not invest in the education, and infrastructure of the kingdom, and when he left, the kingdom had a very few elites, and intellectuals.
<span />
In the north of IRAN we find (800 km long and 320 km wide) the Dasht-e-Kavir Desert, being a very arid region with temperatures up to 50 degrees Celsius, in the west the desert borders a salt lake called Darya -ye Namak which is formed of large plates of salt because they evaporate because of the high temperatures of the desert
I hope I've helped
Chartism was the first movement both working class in character and national in scope that grew out of the protest against the injustices of the new industrial and political order in Britain.
Answer:
According to Marx, a major impedament is the discord among the proletariat.
Explanation:
The persons with the most resources have a tendency to be in control, the top 5% verus the other 95%. The proletariat is too divided into many issues, which prevents them from joining forces to overtake the top 5%. Marx theorized that if the proletariat were to join forces collectively, they could affect change in their direction.
