Answer:
1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on. He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.
2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder. The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again: identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.
3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment. (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person. Therefore, (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.
This expression means that you don’t have to make a decision right about a future problem. You should decide what to do about that problem when the problem is directly in front of you.
Answer:
They are relieved that Grendel is dead and their trials are over now.
Explanation:
The Danish people were relieved that this wellknown warrior had come to help them kill Grendel. He killed the monster himself, without the help of any Danish warriors. The Danish were great fighters but the beast had been ravaging their people and their lands for too long.
<span>The tragic element do the Chorus Leader’s lines reveal is </span>Hamartia.
