Hello. Did you forget to show that the underlined words to which the question refers are: cruel favor
In addition, you forgot to show the answer options. The options are:
The underlined figure of speech is ________ (choices: a euphemism, a simile, a metaphor, an oxymoron)
The reader can infer that ________ (choices: the narrator plans to take up baking with Lisette, the narrator feels that Lisette should do her more favors, the narrator will pretend to enjoy Lisette's brownies, the narrator suspects that Lisette is dishonest with her)
Answer:
1. euphemism
2. the narrator will pretend to enjoy Lisette's brownies
Explanation:
Euphenism is the figure of speech that has a lighter and more pleasant term, softening a bad meaning of another term that could be used. In this case, when the narrator says that Lisette took the Brownies as a "cruel favor" he wanted to soften the meaning that eating her brownies would be a bad experience.
Furthermore, by using eupenism, the author reinforces the idea that since Lisette is a very kind person, he will pretend to like the brownies, even if he doesn't like it.
Answer:
Which type of context clue is used to help you figure out the meaning of ... Synonym context clue ... After reading the sentence represnted above, I recognized the type of ... out the meaning of the word jaunt and it is antonym context clue. ... you understand the meaning of the word petulantly in this sentence?
Explanation:
I believe the tone is somewhat dramatic based on the dialogue such as "shot his hand out in front of him", it makes the story seem a lot more interesting than what it really is; a normal encounter.
A comparative form compares two places, people, or things. I would go with option "B". It is the only word that could be used in a sentence to compare two things. Vanilla ice cream is worse than chocolate ice cream. That compares two things.
I hope this helped you!
Brainliest answer is always appreciated! <span />
