1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoray [572]
3 years ago
15

Counteranalysis—Legal Position or Argument Based on a Statute Legislative Acts: Section 359-23A of the state statutes provides t

hat to be eligible to run for the state senate, an individual must have been a resident of the state for three years. Local ordinance § 2231 provides that an individual must be a resident of the municipality to run for a position on the city council. The ordinance does not define resident or residency.
Facts: Jerrie wishes to run for the city council. She has been a resident of the state for two years and nine months. The city clerk informs her that she is not eligible to run for city council because she has not been a resident of the state for three years. The clerk says that the city relies on the residency requirement established in § 359-23A. Assignment: What is the counterargument to the clerk's position?
Social Studies
1 answer:
ira [324]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:What is counterargument? Is a stamement or position that there are alternative or options positions. I.e option positions. E.g : if my argument is that rice is better food than beans because they are easily digestible but you argue that beans are better foods because they are good source of protein, the stand here is a counterargument to position.

To identify counterargument for the Jerrie is that she's has been a resident of the state for two years and nine which remains only three months to complete her three years stay to be eligible to run for city council. Therefore someone needs to respond to it by discussing the reasons the argument is incomplete, weak, unsound, or illogical.

Provide examples or evidence to show why the opposing argument is unsound, or provide explanations of how the opposing argument is incomplete or illogical.

Close by stating your own argument and why your argument is stronger than the identified counterargument. The fact that it remains only three only three month to complete the years should be given chance to be eligible even though three years is yet to be completed.

You might be interested in
Has the first amendment changed over time to be as flexible as the rest of the Constitution
sp2606 [1]
No it has not changed
3 0
3 years ago
What is the full meaning of NAFTA and ICPC AND NAFDAC ​ i will mark u as brainliest
Yanka [14]

Answer:

NAFTA: The North American Free Trade Agreement

ICPC: Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children

NAFDAC: National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control

Explanation:

hope that helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Rashid is dissatisfied at work. He feels he is paid too little and asked to do too much. To compensate for his perceived unjust
iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

Workplace Deviance

Explanation:

Workplace deviance, in group psychology, may be described as the deliberate (or intentional) desire to cause harm to an organization – more specifically, a workplace.

3 0
3 years ago
The ______ of a media message is the underlying message and the audience's interpretation of that message.
skad [1K]

Answer:subtext

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it ________.
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.

Explanation:

Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What's Pericles most important accomplishment?
    5·1 answer
  • Bananas are selling briskly at local stores, and supply is easy to maintain. A nationwide ad campaign emphasizes the health bene
    12·1 answer
  • Dr. Zimand is studying the association between the functioning of specific brain structures and depression. It is most likely th
    5·1 answer
  • Es legal el matrimonio entre persnas del mismo sexo en eeuu
    7·1 answer
  • What were foreigners in the Roman army known as?
    7·1 answer
  • Which form of literature was important to Muslim culture during the era of the Islamic caliphates?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the American Revolution affect the government and the people back then ?
    13·2 answers
  • Plays an important role in the production of speech, whereas ________ plays an important role in the comprehension of language.
    15·2 answers
  • Which method was more productive ancient egyptian farming or modern day farming?
    14·2 answers
  • Explain four benefits of primary production<br>​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!