Answer:
The efficient market hypothesis tells, in an equilibrium, the price of stocks or security is an unbiased estimate of the true values.
Explanation:
- Thus, in the equilibrium, of security prices are neither an overvalued nor are undervalued. Suppose the investors learn new information about the company that suggests there stock is worth more than the current price.
- The security gets undervalued expected return exceeds the required return. Increased in demand for security from the investors with this new information will thus bid up the market value plus reduce its expected return until they are equal.
Answer:
$1000
$1010
Explanation:
The formula for determining simple interest = principal x time x interest rate
The formula for determining compound interest = future value - amount invested
FV = P (1 + r)^n
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
N = number of years
1000 X 0.01 X 1 = $10
Given the figures in the question, the simple interest each year would be $10 based on $1000
But the compound interest in year 2 = 1000 x (1.01)^2 = 1020.10
1020.10 - 1000 = 20.1
compound interest in year 2 = 20.1 - 10 = 10.1
or
1010 x 0.01 x 1 = 10.1
Answer: Is useful to managers in planning and decision making.
Explanation:
The Contribution approach to the income statement helps the company understand better the behaviour of it's variable and fixed assets because the Contribution Margin approach first subtracts variable costs from revenue and then subtracts fixed costs.
This allows the company to know which of the costs are more taxing on the company thereby enabling the company to know which to work on. It is therefore useful to managers in planning and decision making.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Given that,
Price of low-quality apples = $1 per pound
Price of high-quality apples = $4 per pound
Marginal utility of low-quality apples = 3 utils
Marginal utility of high-quality apples = 12 utils
Equimarginal:
(Marginal utility of low quality apples ÷ Price per apple) = (Marginal utility of high quality apples ÷ Price per apples)
(3 utils ÷ $1) = (12 utils ÷ $4)
3 = 3
Yes, Timmy is maximizing his utility as his equimarginal utility is same for both the goods as shown above.
