1) ariel spying over Cuba produced pictures that showed missile silos being built in Cuba. The design of the silos made it clear they were designed for missiles, and it made no sense for Cuba to put in anything less than nuclear missiles there. Missiles they could not build themselves, so had to come from the Soviet Union.
2) Only minutes. A launch from the Soviet Union to the US only takes about 20 minutes. Depending on the range of the missiles put into the silos, warning time would have been anywhere from 3-10 minutes. Not enough time to verify that it was a launch, and not a detection system malfunction, forcing America to launch immediately, or risk losing its capacity to strike back.
3) A direct attack or invasion of Cuba would have forced the Soviet Union to respond in kind. The USSR simply could not abandon Cuba, without losing all credibility among its allies and vassal states. So they would likely have struck back at the US, probably in Europe. This would have dangerously escalated the tensions, and increased the probability of nuclear war. Other officials believed that a quick,determined strike would not only eliminate the immediate threat of missiles in Cuba, but possibly overthrow the regime and force the USSR to accept the situation. The idea of a naval blockade was a compromise position. A threat of force, but one that allowed the USSR to back off. After all, so long as the missiles were not put into the silos, they were no threat.
Answer:
D. Sixth Amendment right-to-counsel provision applies to those accused of major crimes under state laws
Explanation:
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the <u>Sixth Amendment right-to-counsel provision applies to those accused of major crimes under state laws.</u>
"Horatio Gates" is the general among the following choices given in the question that <span>the continental congress designate the new commander of the south due to being a hero at Saratoga. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. I hope the answer has helped you.</span>
Answer: That British Colonialism is Sucking Natural Resources Out of Africa, Asia, Australia, and South America.
Explanation: um hm.
Answer:
TW//
I went to a plantation during spring break and I learned in depth how slaves were treated. But one that really stuck out to me is how the women were treated as s3x objects. They were rap3d and they were also forced to have children to increase the slave populations.
Explanation:
