1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nostrana [21]
3 years ago
13

How did the economic goals of urban labor differ from those of rural labor

History
1 answer:
kondor19780726 [428]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Agriculture and Industrial

Explanation:

Rural labour would be agriculture (farming) whereas Urban labour is factories.

Urban labour would aim to manufacture products like electronics, furniture and other objects whereas rural labour would aim to grow crops and kill animals for meat and harvest other edible products.

Rural labour would happen in fields and places away from where people however urban labour happens in cities.

Hope that helped :)

You might be interested in
What were the effects after Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

The Roman Empire was once a superpower. Back in the days of the early 2nd century, Emperor Trajan stretched the kingdom's territory to its maximum. After that, how to secure the frontier had become an issue that all the future emperors had to address. Because most of those emperors were not nearly as capable as Trajan, the Roman Empire was soon in trouble. By the 3rd century, the situation had grown so bad that this once formidable powerhouse was at the brink of self-destruction. During the period from 235 A.D. to 284 A.D. (often called the crisis of the third century, the military anarchy, or the imperial crisis), more than two-dozen emperors came and went. Out-of-control inflation brought the economy to its knees. And foreign tribes continued to harass the borders. Just as things could not get worse for the Roman Empire, relief finally arrived. In November of 284 A.D., Diocletian, a forceful Roman general, seized power and declared himself the new emperor. One of his earliest orders was to split the Roman Empire in two. He kept the eastern part and gave the western half to his colleague, Maximian.  Diocletian's decision was bold but practical. He figured that the Roman Empire had simply grown too big over the years to be managed effectively by a single person. In 285 A.D., he named his trusted military friend, Maximian, as a Caesar or a junior emperor, while he himself was named an Augustus or a senior emperor. The following year, Diocletian promoted Maximian to be his equal, so both men held the title of Augustus and ruled the split Roman Empire side-by-side. Diocletian chose the city of Nicomedia (modern day's Izmit, Turkey) to be the capital of his Eastern Roman Empire, whereas Maximian picked Milan to be the capital of his Western Roman Empire. With the kingdom broken into two, Diocletian and Maximian were each responsible for fighting the enemies in their respective territory. As it was no longer necessary to stretch the troops across the entire empire, it was much easier to put down the rebels. Diocletian's daring experiment paid off handsomely. By 293 A.D., Diocletian decided to go a step further and resolve the issue of succession once and for all. That year, both of the senior emperors handpicked their own Caesar. Diocletian chose Galerius, and Maximian selected Constantius. Galerius and Constantius were like apprentices. They did not sit idly waiting for the two senior emperors to die or to retire. Instead, they were each given a sizable territory and had their own capital. Galerius resided at Sirmium (in today's Serbia), and Constantius camped at Trier (in today's Germany). Diocletian called this new power structure tetrarchy or "rule by four."

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What were the "common people" in the French Revolution?
Keith_Richards [23]

\huge\fbox\red{❥answer}

  • Napoleon
  • Jacques-Pierre Brissot.
  • Charles de Calonne.
  • Lazare Carnot.
  • Marquis de Lafayette.
  • Louis XVI.
  • Marie-Antoinette.
  • Jacques Necker.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did MLK and John Kerry appose the war
prisoha [69]

Answer:

Both Martin Luther King Jr. and John Kerry opposed the Vietnam War because they both, along with millions of other Americans, thought it was immoral thing to do.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements best describes the effects of Commodore Perry’s visit to Japan in the 1850s?
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Japan modernized its government and economy

Explanation:

after commodore Perry visited Japan he threatened them into trading with America and forced them to have to modernize their government

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did James Madison think it was possible to have tyranny in a democracy? Why
Mandarinka [93]
Yes. Because democracy is the tyranny of the majority. Thats why we are supposed to be a constitutional republic, that way minority rights are protected against mob rule.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is interesting about the pings that were sent to the european website?
    15·1 answer
  • Mark the statement if it describes the Roman Empire at its height.
    7·2 answers
  • What is the reason for the United States taking military action in the Middle East from 1990 to 2016?
    13·1 answer
  • Slaves were brought to the United States in the early 1600s. true false
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement about the HUAC Hollywood hearings is true?
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Who killed osama bin laden​
    10·1 answer
  • What area of America were the French and Colonists fighting over? Why?
    6·1 answer
  • Full sentences please.....
    8·1 answer
  • How does the sculpture create realism ?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!