All categories

3 years ago

Evaluate this expression (-7--9)*(8+2)

1 answer:

5 0

Before we get started, it is good to remember PEMDAS - the acronym that tells you the order to carry out equations.

P = parentheses
E = exponents
M = multiplication
D = division
A = addition
S = subtraction

Knowing this, we should start by doing the equations <em>within </em>each parentheses.

$(-7 - -9) *(8 + 2)$
$(2) *(10)$

So we did the addition and subtraction pieces within each group leaving us with the above equation. Now let's multiply:

$(2)*(10) = 20$

20 is the answer.

You might be interested in

What is 55% of 80 Answer: 8, 80,4.4 or 44

vova2212 [387]

44. you multiply 80 by .55

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Exercise 3 Iron Man is checking out a new suit that fires lasers more accurately. If he is aiming for a bullseye, his original s

Novosadov [1.4K]

Answer: (a). insufficient evidence.

(b). sufficient evidence

(c). insufficient evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

we will analyse this carefully to help us understand it better.

we have the standard deviation for the original suit = 2mm

standard deviation for new suit = 1.6mm

given n = 1.6

from the question we know that the suit with less standard deviation is better than the other suit

considering a null hypothesis;

H₀ : б ≥ 2, (here the new suit is not better than the original alternative hypothesis).

Also Hi : б < 2 (we have here that the new suit is better than the original )

using the Chi-Square distribution with n-1 degree of freedom to test the claim about the value of the standard deviation;

X² = (n-1) s²/ б² = (16-1)(1.6)² / (2)² = 9.6

taking the P value of X² (9.6) for 15 D O F from the P value table gives us

1-0.8441 = 0.1559

also ∝ = 0.05

where P-value > ∝ (0.05)

we can see from here that there is insufficient evidence to claim that new suit is better than that of the original suit, having failed to neglect H₀

(b). Given n = 100 and s = 1.6

then we have that X² = (n-1) s²/ б² = (100-1)(1.6)² / (2)² = 63.36

P-value of X² at 99 dif gives 0.0020

where ∝ = 0.05

since P value < ∝

rejecting the null hypothesis H₀,

we can safely say that there is sufficient claim that the new suit is better than the original at 95%.

(c). where we have that ∝ = 0.001

for part(b) P-values = 0.0020

given P-value > ∝ ;

we fail to neglect the null hypothesis.

From this we can say that the is insufficient evidence backing the claim thhat the new suit is better than the original suit at 99.99% confidence level.

cheers i hope this helps!!!!!

5 0

3 years ago

*<br> Simplify the expression:<br> (-6p+7). -4

Art [367]

Answer:

I'm assuming you need to distribute. When simplified the expression is 42p-28

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Melanie makes $3.00 less per hour babysitting than her best friend, Carita. If the combined hourly rate of Melanie and Carita is