Hello,
Is this the exact order for the questions?
international gathering to celebrate sporting achievement
large infrastructure projects to benefit the public written constitution based on natural rights
direct election of the ruler by all residents of the empire
If thats the order then the closest answer is D, But it seems your missing one due to the fact that none of thease match with the question so in this case if there is another answer that should be the correct one. Enjoy!
The correct answer is B) Korea achieve independence because Japan lost the war.
<em>The movement toward independence in India differs from that in Korea in that Korea achieve independence because Japan lost the war.</em>
The Japanese had invaded Korea and annexed it in 1910. The Korean independence leaders had to leave Korea and went to China, under the support of the Nationalist Government of China.
China became an Allied during World War II, so with the Declaration of El Cairo in 1943, Korea should be an independent nation, but the Soviet-Japanese War did not allow that to happen. The result of that confrontation divided Korea into North Korea, controlled by the Soviet Union, and South Korea, under the influence of the United States.
The correct answer is choice 3- the economy would improve if Americans had more money to spend
A. The invasion of Normandy involved heavy air bombardments, followed by paratroopers, and finally amphibious landings on the beaches.
To begin with, a journal is a problematic source of information because it is usually the impressions of the person who writes it, and therefore they are very subjective. In the case raised, the journal is even more problematic because it is written by a citien of East Berlin in a period marked by political ideology.
To check if it is a reliable source, I would begin by trying to find out as much information as possible about the person who writes it to get an idea of his or her personal and ideological background since it will set the tone of the narration: ideology, in which area of East Berlin he or she lived, where he or she worked.
Secondly, I would look for other contrasted sources that mention this journal to know if it has already been taken into account and studied or if it has been discredited.
Then, in order to contrast the information present in the journal, I would look for specific places, dates and events reported by the writer and compare them to newspapers, periodical reports from that time or other bibliographical sources (public libraries or databases) to assess the author's rigour.
In no case would I study the journal as an isolated source without comparing it to others to interpret the information available.
