1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Irina-Kira [14]
3 years ago
14

Can someone help me plz?

English
2 answers:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
3 0
First box: I, me, my
Second box: you
Third box: his, they
natali 33 [55]3 years ago
3 0
Red box:I,me,my
Blue box:You
Orange/Yellow box: They,his
I hope this helped
You might be interested in
How does Odyssey sense of curiosity affect the progress of the plot in The Odyssey
Bad White [126]
His curiosity hinders his journey back home" is the best option in terms of how Odysseus' sense of curiosity affect the progress of the plot in The Odyssey.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Excerpt from: The Most Dangerous Game
saul85 [17]

The answer to your question would be that suspense is created in the passage partly due to it being written in the third person limited point of view. That is, your answer would be C.

In the third person limited point of view, the narrator follows the thoughts and feelings of only one character. One character is closely followed throughout the story, and it is typically the main character. In this case, the narrator only follows Rainsford, someone else is seeing and narrating how he feels and that is what builds up the suspense.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the major difference of interpretation between T. S. Eliot's "The Waste Land" and Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tale
Softa [21]

How the two authors view the month of April. Apex

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir."
Mademuasel [1]

The reason why Prince said he had no freedom to fight for is the fact that he was a slave, as stated in option 1 and further explained below.

<h3>Why can't Prince fight?</h3>

According to the passage we are analyzing here, Prince was a slave who belonged to William. His owner expect Prince to join him in battle, that is, to fight alongside him. However, Prince explains that he cannot do so.

The reason why Prince has "no freedom to fight for" is the fact that he was a slave. Prince could very well join William in battle, but what for? Why should he fight for freedom when he is denied it? How can a slave be asked to die for the freedom of white people when his own people are treated as possessions?

By saying so, Prince got William to free him. Apparently, that sentence was an eye-opener to his master, who only now realized the incoherence there is in asking a slave to fight for freedom.

With the information above in mind, we can select option 1 as the correct answer.

This is part of the missing passage which we need to answer this question:

"At the time he began his military service, William owned a slave like most of his peers. The slave, named Prince, would have been expected to join William and serve with him in battle. As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir." Seeing the truth in this, William is reported to have freed Prince immediately. Today, we look back on history through a great fog of time, and with lenses clouded by our own modern values. Our Founding Fathers displayed admirable courage in crafting and signing such a brilliant claim to human liberty."

These are the missing answer choices:

  • He was a slave.
  • He was not a soldier.
  • He did not believe in fighting.
  • He was a British citizen.

Learn more about slaves here:

brainly.com/question/782305

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
How does
Ludmilka [50]

The peace we seek in the world begins in human hearts. And it finds its glorious expression when we look beyond any differences in religion or tribe, and rejoice in the beauty of every soul.

President Barack Obama stated America need to uphold moral requirements when waging wars that are essential and justified, as he usual his Nobel Peace Prize. In his speech in Oslo, he defended the us role in Afghanistan, arguing the use of force should bring lasting peace.

I do now not convey with me nowadays a definitive solution to the troubles of warfare, said President Obama. What I do understand is that meeting these demanding situations would require the equal imaginative and prescient, difficult paintings, and persistence of those women and men who acted so boldly decades ago. And it will require us to suppose in new approaches about the notions of just warfare and the imperatives of a simply peace.

We ought to start via acknowledging the difficult reality that we will not get rid of violent struggle in our lifetimes. There can be instances when countries  appearing personally or in concert  will locate the usage of pressure no longer only important but morally justified.

Learn more about Barack Obama here:- brainly.com/question/25293190

#SPJ9

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. PART B: Which quotation from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
    10·1 answer
  • Combine the word parts to create a properly spelled word. enjoy + ing =
    9·1 answer
  • Why would using detections dogs make the investigation more efficient?
    13·1 answer
  • How does a metaphor most clearly contribute to the overall meaning of the poem?
    8·1 answer
  • 4. Write the etymology, or origin, of the word incendiary.
    15·2 answers
  • When thinking about clothing choices, or fashion choices, what factors impact your fashion choices for yourself? Explain.​
    9·1 answer
  • How does research bring new ideas into an ongoing conversation?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. We will---------the teacher about the homework we forgot. *
    8·2 answers
  • What does it mean wage?
    13·2 answers
  • What was Selfridge like as a boss?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!