All categories

3 years ago

Can someone help me plz?

English

2 answers:

MArishka [77]3 years ago

3 0

First box: I, me, my
Second box: you
Third box: his, they

natali 33 [55]3 years ago

3 0

Red box:I,me,my
Blue box:You
Orange/Yellow box: They,his
I hope this helped

You might be interested in

How does Odyssey sense of curiosity affect the progress of the plot in The Odyssey

Bad White [126]

His curiosity hinders his journey back home" is the best option in terms of how Odysseus' sense of curiosity affect the progress of the plot in The Odyssey.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Excerpt from: The Most Dangerous Game

saul85 [17]

The answer to your question would be that suspense is created in the passage partly due to it being written in the third person limited point of view. That is, your answer would be C.

In the third person limited point of view, the narrator follows the thoughts and feelings of only one character. One character is closely followed throughout the story, and it is typically the main character. In this case, the narrator only follows Rainsford, someone else is seeing and narrating how he feels and that is what builds up the suspense.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the major difference of interpretation between T. S. Eliot's "The Waste Land" and Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tale

Softa [21]

How the two authors view the month of April. Apex

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir."

Mademuasel [1]

The reason why Prince said he had no freedom to fight for is the fact that he was a slave, as stated in option 1 and further explained below.

<h3>Why can't Prince fight?</h3>

According to the passage we are analyzing here, Prince was a slave who belonged to William. His owner expect Prince to join him in battle, that is, to fight alongside him. However, Prince explains that he cannot do so.

The reason why Prince has "no freedom to fight for" is the fact that he was a slave. Prince could very well join William in battle, but what for? Why should he fight for freedom when he is denied it? How can a slave be asked to die for the freedom of white people when his own people are treated as possessions?

By saying so, Prince got William to free him. Apparently, that sentence was an eye-opener to his master, who only now realized the incoherence there is in asking a slave to fight for freedom.

With the information above in mind, we can select option 1 as the correct answer.

This is part of the missing passage which we need to answer this question:

"At the time he began his military service, William owned a slave like most of his peers. The slave, named Prince, would have been expected to join William and serve with him in battle. As they were preparing to leave, Prince told William, "I have no freedom to fight for, sir." Seeing the truth in this, William is reported to have freed Prince immediately. Today, we look back on history through a great fog of time, and with lenses clouded by our own modern values. Our Founding Fathers displayed admirable courage in crafting and signing such a brilliant claim to human liberty."

These are the missing answer choices:

He was a slave.

He was not a soldier.

He did not believe in fighting.

He was a British citizen.

Learn more about slaves here:

brainly.com/question/782305

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

How does

Ludmilka [50]

The peace we seek in the world begins in human hearts. And it finds its glorious expression when we look beyond any differences in religion or tribe, and rejoice in the beauty of every soul.

President Barack Obama stated America need to uphold moral requirements when waging wars that are essential and justified, as he usual his Nobel Peace Prize. In his speech in Oslo, he defended the us role in Afghanistan, arguing the use of force should bring lasting peace.

I do now not convey with me nowadays a definitive solution to the troubles of warfare, said President Obama. What I do understand is that meeting these demanding situations would require the equal imaginative and prescient, difficult paintings, and persistence of those women and men who acted so boldly decades ago. And it will require us to suppose in new approaches about the notions of just warfare and the imperatives of a simply peace.

We ought to start via acknowledging the difficult reality that we will not get rid of violent struggle in our lifetimes. There can be instances when countries appearing personally or in concert will locate the usage of pressure no longer only important but morally justified.

Learn more about Barack Obama here:- brainly.com/question/25293190

#SPJ9

3 0

2 years ago