In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court ruled that the wearing of a black armband in protest of the Vietnam War was not a substantial disruption of the school environment and was therefore protected speech.
It is the first major case to determine the speech rights of students.
In Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the Supreme Court placed a limit on the speech rights of students when it ruled that it was permissible for a school to censor the actions of a school newspaper.
This is important as it provides a limit on the speech rights of students.
At issue in both cases are how the speech is disruptive to the school environment and many cases since then have hinged on the importance of the speech (protest in Tinker v. spreading gossip in Hazelwood) and the manner in which the speech is undertaken.
Answer:
A. to ease tension to promote negotiation
Explanation:
Martin Luther King Jr. was aware that violence rarely solves problems in which no side gets hurt. This led him to believe that while the African Americans should 'fight' for their rights, they should do it peacefully. If they used violence, it would give a reason for their opponents to use violence, as well as take away any outside support that may have formed through sympathy from using non-violence means. Also, if their opponents use violence and they answer with non-violence, it would also draw people away from their opponents, and embrace the cause of giving Africans more rights.
~
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A limited govt. means the govt. has limited power
I don’t know the answer but pls do not click the link the other person sent!! it is a scam
Neoconservatives warn about the dangers posed to society by abandoning the traditional values of the country of United States of America. Neoconservatives are actually American conservative politicians who favored the intervention of the government and was particularly hostile towards the intervention of religion in politics and government.