1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anastassius [24]
3 years ago
9

Describe how romantic novel is differ from other types of novels ?.

English
1 answer:
Goshia [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

That's because a "romantic novel is based on a relationship between two characters in the story." In other novels such as horrors, comedy, detective, or science fiction they have a different basis and will be about different things. For example a detective novel will be about one person who solves crimes and the adventures he has while solving those crimes.

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in
PART A: Which of the following best identifies a central idea of the interview? *
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

Experts disagree about the effects of technological growth on our economy ;I think that is the answer

4 0
3 years ago
Read this list of words. since seek start spoon If this list were in ABC order, which word would be first? A. since B. seek C. s
Lelechka [254]
Seek would be the first word
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of evidence does the student use in paragraph 2 of the essay
Liula [17]
Idk because you don't give us the 2 paragraphs of the essay.
4 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
Okkk, So I need some help.
sveta [45]

Answer:

Tips for effective writing

Start writing early —the earlier the better. ...

Keep the essay question in mind. ...

Don't try to write an essay from beginning to end, especially not in a single sitting. ...

Write the introduction and conclusion after the body. ...

Use 'signpost' words in your writing. ...

Integrate your evidence carefully.

Explanation:

i hope this helps :)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When arguing with tybalt, what word that tybalt says seems to bother or annoy mercutio
    7·2 answers
  • In science class, the students are learning about the causes and ________________ of chemical reactions. The Watsons Go to Birmi
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!!BRAINLEST
    12·1 answer
  • Which event in Macbeth happens first?
    8·2 answers
  • Thomas Paine used tone and persuasive language to _____.
    14·1 answer
  • How does paragraph 6 support the author's claim about music developing our brains?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these were challenges in England during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries? Check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • What is the difference between internal and external conflict?
    15·1 answer
  • In her book The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood, sociologist Sharon Hays describes an ideology she calls intensive motherh
    5·1 answer
  • Name the five senses of poetry:​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!