1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bazaltina [42]
3 years ago
13

With the emergence of technology, new societal standards and perspectives; should it be fair to "destroy" monuments/statues dedi

cated to people, whom are dictators to peace and harmony?
History
1 answer:
leva [86]3 years ago
6 0
I would not think so because those statues were created for a reason and not just to say "hey i have a statue" but to say "hey i have done somthing important and the world should remember me by it"
You might be interested in
Why are there not many sculptures in the middle kingdom?​
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer: Most likely people broke them. Knowing how people are, probably just broke them apart, or at least I would think.

Explanation:

It happened a lot to old rhome ancient history items

3 0
3 years ago
After the fall of the Roman Empire, which political force assumed the civic duties?
mina [271]
The Catholic Church is the correct answer

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the result of the margin calls from brokers on October 21, 1929?
Fed [463]

Answer:

The right answer is "A panic ensued and people began to sell their stocks, causing prices to dive."

Explanation:

The margin calls made by brokers cause a mini-crash of the market on March 25, 1929. Prices plummeted. There was a temporary solution when some prominent bankers promised they would continue to lend, assuaging investors´concerns.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government
Vadim26 [7]
The federal government was left powerless and could not make any decisions overall
5 0
4 years ago
Identify Wars in Korea and Vietnam and explain how the US involvement resulted in a success or failure.
olasank [31]

Answer:the korean war was a seccess and vietnam was a failure.

Explanation:

The goals in the two wars was to prevent the spread of communism. We did prevent north korea from invading the south which was the goal, but in vietnam we did not prevent it. it used to be north and south vietnam but now it is just vietnam.

concussion: korean war was a success and vietnam was a failure

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • European imperialism in Asia began in _____. China Japan Siam India
    13·2 answers
  • What factor benefited the Republican Party in the 1970s?
    13·1 answer
  • Who are the victims of Artemis
    7·1 answer
  • In Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, states are forbidden from keeping a standing army or navy. Why would the Constitution restri
    6·1 answer
  • Which expeditions of Napoleon's proved disastrous to France AND to his career?
    8·1 answer
  • IDENTIFYING EFFECTS How did government involvement influence the relationship
    14·1 answer
  • During the presidential election of 1860,which political party was divided on the issue of slavery?
    12·2 answers
  • How many levels in hierarchy did woese have
    10·1 answer
  • 2.. What was each group's goal, and what did they accomplish? Fill in the chart.
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the 4th Crusade an embarrassment to the pope
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!