The excerpt uses explicit details in the following way: it provides a <u>physical description</u> of Sarah Penn (small woman, short waist, gray hair, mild forehead, downward lines about her nose and mouth). All of it is explicit, since there is no room for interpretation, it is what it is. In other words, such details are concrete ones, since they are physical and nothing else.
As for implicit details, we can find them in a figure of speech (a <u>hypallage</u>, which uses an adjective or participle to describe a noun other than the person or thing it is in fact describing): we learn Sarah Penn's forehead was benevolent, that is, it showed her benevolence (an implicit detail, since it was Sarah, and not her forehead, that was benevolent). It is a trait which implicitly tells something about the character's personality. There is also the description of <u>meek downward lines</u> about her nose and mouth. Again, a hypallage which implicitly tells us something about the character: it is Sarah who is gentle and humble, and not the lines about her nose and mouth.
A simile is a metaphor that straightforwardly analyzes two things. This is a type of illustration that unequivocally utilize interfacing words, (for example, like, as, so, than,), however these particular words are not generally necessary. So in here, the answer is A, since it does not compare two things and there is no words like like, as, so, or than.
Answer:
Explanation:
Explain on how to grow plant
You the the following procedures before you can grow plant
1. You need a piece of land for the farming
2. After getting the land, you need proper clearing and packing of the farm land.
3.after the clearing and burning of the farm land you can makes some heaps if necessary. That is based on the farm land.
4.After this you can start planting your crops....
The bandwagon fallacy is in the insistence that good cities are good because they have rail.
Explanation:
The bandwagon fallacy is where the causation of something is confused as an effect.<u> It is the argument that because all the great cities of the country have light rail, our city too should have the same light rail system to be as good as them.</u>
This argument falls apart because the rail will not curb the problems that the passage itself talks about and then willfully ignores. I<u>n fact, bringing the rail to town will actually aggravate some of the issues mentioned here</u>. Which is why the argument becomes more weak.
