He missed the sights, smells and sounds of his own neighborhood.
<u>Explanation</u>:
- Colin had travelled a half-way around the world and he didn't have a hard time. He had been wondering who might he would become after those travels.
- But he longed for his home, his real home in England. He missed his friends, sights, smells and sounds of his neighborhood. Before the thought of joining the conversation with the guide,he thought of this in his mind.
Answer:
probably b or d :) sry if im wrong tried my best
A- first person
It’s your own narrative and perspective so it should be first person
The correct answer is answer D ("Slippery slope").
This type of fallacy presents itself when the clear core of a discussion is taken out of proportion by suggesting a possible chain of negative events that could come as a direct consequence of that core element.
In this case, the core element of the discussion is whether or not a school should determine how their students should dress, <u>which is a reasonably small imposition</u>. The argument against it suggests that if we give a school that right, they would be likely to also try imposing what students can say outside of class, <u>which is a wild exaggeration</u>. It's clear how out-of-propotion this argument is as the school would have no way of monitoring students outside school and there's no clear reason to suspect the school wants this level of control anyways.
Looking out for this type of wild exaggerations that try to relate two very different events and disguise them as a cause-and-effect realtionship is the best way of recognizing the slippery slope fallacy.
Hope this helps!
