The answer to this question is yes.
A hungry wolf shouted at his pack.
A comfortable couch sat in the lounge, waiting to be accompanied.
A car ran down the highway.
A cell phone sang its ringtone.
A butterfly danced through the air.
A dinosaur settled down to rest.
Stars beamed the night sky, looking down on the earth.
Mountains sat omnipotently, watching over the surrounding villages.
Ocean waves ran along the shoreline.
A boiling pot sighed steam out once the lid was opened.
Answer:
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
The excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines that shows how precedent helps support an argument is: "Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the 'reasonableness' test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the States". This excerpt shows how the Supreme Court uses decisions of other cases already resolved to support arguments within cases in decision at the moment .In the present case, the Court uses the precedent West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the doctrine of "reasonableness" of McReynolds is not admitted, to apply it to the case Tinker v. Des Moines.
False, it was published in 1722, " on the other side" was published in 1485 was the first English novel, written by Le Morte d'Arthur.
