1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Damm [24]
3 years ago
9

Anyone wanna have a simple Chat? BTW I am 14​

English
2 answers:
grigory [225]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I am only 11 if u are 14 then chat with the person in the chats

bogdanovich [222]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

what 14.................... ........... ......

You might be interested in
I don’t understand this
Tanya [424]

Answer:

The water must be heated.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ill give brainly! Read the run-on sentence.
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

Keira is in the band, and she practices her trumpet every day.

Explanation:

from what i think, i think its best if you use that choice. in this sentence chosen you have a comma to help give a stop in a sentence and right after the comma you have the word "and". i dont know if this make sense but i hope it does :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the political, cultural , and literary climate of the English Middle Ages ?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

Germanic invaders, Christianity and Islam

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following arguments uses a non sequitur fallacy?
GuDViN [60]

The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"

Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.

So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.

8 0
3 years ago
How does the author justify her claim that making English an official language would harm some Native American groups? A. by emp
Setler [38]

The author justify her claim that making English an official language would harm some Native American groups by explaining how an English-only requirement would be less efficient and would limit cultural expression.

<h3>How did the Native Americans react to the English?</h3>

Native Americans in Colonial America were said to have resisted the work or power of the Europeans to get more land and control in course of the colonial period.

Note that The author justify her claim that making English an official language would harm some Native American groups by explaining how an English-only requirement would be less efficient and would limit cultural expression.

Learn more about Native Americans from

brainly.com/question/24724492

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the first paragraph the word environment means
    7·2 answers
  • Yellowstone possesses nearly 60 percent of the world's geysers. The Upper Geyser Basin is home to more geysers than any other pa
    15·1 answer
  • Is the underlined clause independent or subordinate?
    11·1 answer
  • Write a letter to your brother describing about harmful effect of junk food​
    5·2 answers
  • 5.17 Unit Test: The Source of Information: Part 1 who knows the answers?
    8·1 answer
  • As the program concludes, Hailey makes a comment that sends Starr into a
    6·1 answer
  • The gardener put in a pinch of grass seed wherever he pulled out a weed.
    10·1 answer
  • Scrolling through memes so that I could post one, just to talk to people.
    9·2 answers
  • HELP I need help pls help
    14·1 answer
  • Alisha heard that Brett was spreading false rumors about her at school. Angry and hurt, Alisha decided to solve the problem by a
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!