WHO EVER ANSWERS FIRST GETS BRAINLIEST Read the conclusion from Susan B. Anthony’s speech, “On Women's Right to Vote.” The only
question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, the women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one against Negroes. Anthony most likely concludes her speech in this manner because she hopes to inspire all citizens to fight for their right to vote. persuade the audience that important causes are worth fighting for. encourage the audience to question laws that are outdated or that no longer apply. convince the audience that women are entitled to the same rights as men.
Answer: A) Almost none of the students will be able to do this.
Explanation: since they all disagree to the argument, it's a likely possibility that none of them would want to tread that path as to argue something they don't want. They could only argue against the motion, but as it seems that was not the requirement.
It's not B: It provides a meaningful counterpoint to the previously expressed idea that the time the refugees spent in the U.S. camps was characterized by great joy and relief.
