Answer:
b. His tolerance of racial and religious differences.
Explanation:
Roger Williams was a theologian, author and Puritan minister who staunchly support the issues relating to freedom of religion. He also advocated for the separation of the state and church, fair dealing of cases regarding American Indians and was himself one of the very first abolitionists.
Roger Williams established the Providence Plantations, later known as the Colony of Rhode Island. He also founded the first Baptist Church in America in 1638. He had migrated to America for he felt that the Church of England from which all power lies, is not a just way of governing any nation. So, he started advocating for the wrongs in the world, especially about the separation of the powers and duties of the church and the state and the statuses of American Indians and the Blacks/ slaves in America.
Answer:
To tell a story from the narrator's perspective.
Answer:
<h2>Brainiest me</h2>
Explanation:
You will probably communicate differently with each of these groups of people. However, effective communication is much the same no matter with whom you are communicating.
Communication is a two-way process. You can talk as much as you want, but if nobody is listening there is no communication. When you first meet others, they will not know how you communicate or anything about you. They will probably expect you to be a reasonable person until you prove otherwise.
To start your relationship off right, and to build understanding with that person, you need to treat them with respect.
Answer:
A. Before he knew it, Conner was demonstrating how to bend the ball into the goal to score an unexpected
point and win the game in the final quarter.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, we can read the conclusion of Victor Frankenstein about science: in the 19th century, scientists pursue their studies at any personal or moral cost:
"With a confusion of ideas only to be accounted for by my extreme youth and my want of a guide on such matters, I had retrod the steps of nowledge along the paths of time and exchanged the discoveries of recent inquirers for the dreams of forgotten alchemists. Besides, I had a contempt for the uses of modern natural philosophy. It was very different when the masters of the science sought immortality and power; such views, although futile, were grand; but now the scene was changed. The ambition of the inquirer seemed to limit itself to the annihilation of those visions on which my interest in science was chiefly founded. I was required to exchange chimeras of boundless grandeur for realities of little worth.
Such were my reflections during the first two or three days of my residence at Ingolstadt, which were chiefly spent in becoming acquainted with the localities and the principal residents (..)"
When the objective of the science experiments is only the recognition, the need for making something original and spectacular, to be regarded by other scientists the results could be terrible. For example, the creation of the poor monster of Frankenstein story.
