Answer:
O b. They support the practice of overfishing.
Explanation:
As seen in the given passage, the main issue is that of the misuse of government subsidies. Though such subsidies are intended to help struggling fisheries, it has also led to some unintended effect.
One such unintended effect is that these subsidies support overfishing. Overfishing is when more than the required or supported number of fishes are put in a single space or area. so, what the author presents is that government subsidies unintentionally help such overfishing that it has become a problem rather than helping it.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
The two lovers seemed doomed from the day. Set up like a bowling pin, and knocked out the very way.
How could they live with out each other, not a peak nor a stare or a quick view of one another.
Cast down to the pits of Hades they remain, and not each and everyone nor wits are the same.
Eurydice once bit. Tragedy came in a lickety- Split.
Answer:
The "I wanted to gobble up the room entirely and take it to Bailey, who would help me analyze and enjoy it"
excerpt from “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” best justifies the inference that Bailey is a supportive brother to Marguerite. This excerpt shows Marguerite's trust to her brother. She believes that her brother can solve her problem.
Explanation:
Hope this was helpful
Sorry I don’t know how to right a poem I don’t understand them. Thanks for the points
