For his own sake, no. What he did blatantly put himself in danger and finally was placed under interrogation, etc & so forth.
For the sake of science, yes. What he did, and the consequences thereof, would have publicised his struggle, especially during the age of Enlightenment. Although what he did might also have momentarily pushed people away from science in fear of the consequences of facing the church due to the harsh punishment that he was subjected to. His persistence was, in the end only healthy for the development of science in later years.
The answer is A. Just took the test !
Answer:
the answer is nor B i had a test on e2020 edginuity and i got a 90 turned out i put B and got it WRONG
i think it is true............................
~<span>Most </span>slaves<span> during the </span>Roman<span> Empire were foreigners and, unlike in modern times, </span>Roman slavery<span> was not based on race. </span>Slaves<span> in </span>Rome<span> might include. Another </span>difference between Roman slavery<span> and its more modern variety was manumission;the ability of </span>slaves<span> to be freed.
Hope this helps.</span>
