Answer:
c. Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance theory: In social psychology, the theory of cognitive dissonance was proposed by an American psychologist named Leon Festinger in 1957. The "cognitive dissonance theory" describes that an individual has an "inner drive" to hold or carry-out all his or her behavior and attitudes in euphony and willing to avoid dissonance or disharmony.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "cognitive dissonance theory".
Answer: The first of the steps to becoming a US citizen is to determine if you are eligible to apply for US citizenship. If you have had a valid green card for at least five years; have been the spouse of a US citizen for at least three years; have served in the U.S. military; or are the child of a U.S. citizen, then you may be eligible for citizenship.
Explanation:
The above given statement is said to be false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Bowen's multi generational approach is not interested in past happening alone. The multi-generational approach in fact tries to find out how the present problems or dysfunctions of specific family members are affected by the generational patterns.
This approach focuses on how the generations of families impact and affect the present behavior and conduct of the individual family members in the present times.
The approach takes into consideration facts related to the family rather than the emotions and thoughts of the families. Prior to this approach, the importance of family and its generations was not considered for the present condition of a family member.
The option that is an example of spillover costs is A. a manufacturer continues to pollute a river because it does not pay the costs for cleaning it.
<u>'Spillover costs' refers to a consequence that affects a third party that has not taken part in a decision</u>. In other words, 'spillover costs' makes reference to the damage provoked by another person to a third party. This idea is often used to talk about pollution, as it happens in option A). In this case,<u> the consequences of pollution experienced by the third party, who must pay the costs for cleaning pollution, are the spillover costs</u>.
I would say yes because their opinions would not be biased by outside influence
