Hope this helps, try looking it up
Answer:
more tolerant than their English counterparts
Explanation:
The line of reasoning illustrates the<span> sunk-cost fallacy.
Basically, the money and lives in the war were already invested. The idea behind it is that if you leave the war then it will all be in vain. Since it was already invested, then there's no reason to leave the war since the costs have to be returned and his idea would be that by staying in the war you might win and then have the benefits that outdo the costs.</span>
Answer: A. The entire country must take action to fight poverty.
Explanation:
The statement that best reflects Johnson's point of view as seen in the excerpt is "The entire country must take action to fight poverty".
This was illustrated when he said that the war against poverty must be won in
the field, He believed that no one is solely responsible to right poverty in the country but rather it should be the responsibility of everybody.
