Answer:
Explanation:
Termes indiquant le thème général : « réflexion […] sur la condition de l’homme ». Ils renvoient de façon très vaste à la question de l’homme mais mettent aussi sur la voie de la littérature d’idées (éventuellement engagée).
Termes indiquant sur quelle « matière » doit porter la réflexion : « œuvres littéraires », c’est-à-dire les textes qui témoignent d’un travail sur la langue et les mots et d’une mise en « forme » (cela exclut les textes de « consommation », les textes scientifiques ou techniques).
La perspective à adopter se trouve dans « efficace », c’est-à-dire qui atteint son objectif, qui est adapté (à son public).
« En quoi » suggère de chercher pourquoi la littérature est efficace, donc d’analyser ses atouts, mais de chercher aussi ses moyens spécifiques.
La problématique est donc : Pourquoi, comment la littérature est-elle efficace pour (faire) réfléchir sur l’homme, exprimer une thèse/des idées, pour argumenter, convaincre ou persuader ?
Vous pouvez éventuellement dépasser ce questionnement et vous demander à quelles conditions la littérature est efficace, si elle ne présente pas des limites ou si elle est suffisante pour faire réfléchir et traiter de la condition de l’homme.
Answer and Explanation:
We are living in the age of digital communication. At all times we see the launch of more technological devices, with more efficient connection networks that allow us to establish communication with anyone anywhere in the world who has access to this type of technology and the best, we can do this without leaving home .
This context seems to establish a perfect reality, where communication is increasingly efficient, but it is not quite so. At least not in the opinion of Sherry Turkle, who believes that in the best place for our communication, technology is destroying it.
In his article "The Flight from Conversation," Turkle states that technology is promoting the loss of the ability to socialize and establish a face-to-face conversation, where it is difficult to hide our real feelings, or "make up" our personality. The expensive conversation the face emits a certain vulnerability that the virtual conversation does not and therefore it is preferable
Turkle uses logical resources to show that disengagement is also an important factor in this situation, because we can be close to people with our goals, but at the same time away, because we don’t need to be close to talking to them, we don’t need to answer communication between them.
Turkle uses clear and direct words, so that anyone can conclude that as technology evolves, communication becomes more artificial and rare, with no real personal connection between individuals.
Answer:
He personalizes the experience for the reader and uses vivid imagery to create a clear mental picture.
Explanation:
The speaker in the excerpt shown above uses a descriptive, adjective language to describe what happens when humans come into contact with a black hole. The adjective-laden language creates multiple images in the reader's mind, causing the reader to create multiple mental images and see everything the author is describing. In other words, we can say that the author conveys the message that humans are no match for the power of a black hole by personalizing the reader's experience and using vivid images to create a clear mental image.
The correct answer should be <span>C. The melancholy scene brought a chill cadence to the back of my neck.
Cadence is related to changes in pitch and intonation and has nothing to do with chills or melancholy.</span>
