1) United States invested in everything, France used Mexico, Germany used the Jews, and Sweden had IKEA
2) He wanted to make it so that there was no state be left behind, and he was all for helping Nevada recover.
3) we have a government that is vary involved in trying to keep our right and allow for a total freedom where other governments could really careless as long as they are making money.
Yes, it halted completely. No cars, commercial trucks, or auto parts were made from February 1942 to October 1945.
Answer:
<h2>d) All of the choices are correct.</h2>
Explanation:
The French Revolution was a movement of the Third Estate (as the commoner class was known) against the elites who controlled all power in France. The 3rd Estate was the bulk of the people (98% of the population), all considered "commoners." (The clergy and nobility were the 1st and 2nd Estates.) So, the 3rd Estate included those from a wealthy, bourgeois wine merchant to a day laborer in the city or a peasant farmer in the countryside. The initial leaders of the Revolution came from a bourgeois background.
When the Revolution began, it was difficult for the bourgeois leaders to manage the new government in a way that met the concerns and demands of the poorer classes (city workers and rural peasants). So the discontent of the poor and the peasants were a problem for the French National Convention. So too was the rise of the Jacobin movement, a more radical group which challenged the more conservative Girondists for power. The "Girondists" were named after the Gironde region, a wine producing region. Wealthier bourgeois types (like wine merchants) were the sort of persons in the Girondist group. The Jacobins were adamant about establishing equality for all persons in France, whereas the Girondists at times seemed more concerned about protecting the interests of businessmen for the sake of a profitable business environment.
Answer:
While most African Americans serving at the beginning of WWII were assigned to non-combat units and relegated to service duties, such as supply, maintenance, and transportation, their work behind front lines was equally vital to the war effort.
In modern America, a war of secession could be caused if some states concentrated on concepts focused on Republican or Democratic ideas. This is because, as we know, these two political aspects have very different, contrasting and adverse ideologies.
Supporters of both ideologies regularly see themselves as hostile and fail to dialogue in a coherent way, highlighting the positive points of each of them and disapproving the negative points that each has. This hostility can trigger tension, which could trigger a secession war if there was a concentration of Republicans in some states and a concentration of Democrats in others.
As we know, the south of the country has a predominance of citizens favorable to republican ideas. Although I do not believe in a possible war of secession today, we can imagine a situation where the concentration of Republicans in the south, generate hostility with the Democratic parties that trigger a second war of secession.
