Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
Was a militant civil rights activist
Explanation:
According to the given excerpt, the words of Malcolm X is quoted where he says that he believes in a fair exchange of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and a life for a life, if that was the price for freedom, it was something he was willing to pay.
Therefore, according to this excerpt, we can conclude that Malcolm X was a military civil rights activist who didn't believe in the nonviolence approach.
Answer:
their is no world war 11
Explanation:
it only goes up to 2 smartsssssssssssssssss