Answer:
C. the Hawthorne effect.
Explanation:
The Hawthorne effect is also known as the observers effect: it consists in a behavioral change of the subjects that are being studied when they become aware that they are being observed. This effect can disrupt the study because subjects stop acting naturally.
Answer:
A. famine
Explanation:
The major contributing factors in the famine were the policies of the Great Leap Forward (1958 to early 1960s) and People's commune, in addition to some natural disasters such as droughts which took place during the period.
The cosmopolitan Carthaginians of North Africa interact with other people through various means, including trade.
The Cosmopolitan Carthaginians were established during their golden era around 300BC.
During this period, the Cosmopolitian Carthaginians were involved in various activities with other people in their immediate regions.
The Cosmopolitan Carthaginian people form different colonies, vassals, and satellite states, along the Mediterranean trade routes, which span places like northwest Africa, southern Iberia, Sicily, Sardinia, etc.
The Cosmopolitan Carthaginians were also involved in agriculture and manufacturing processes whose influence reached places like Balearics, Celtic Gauls, Greeks, Numidians, Libyan, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the Cosmopolitan Carthaginian was a prominent state during the ancient period.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17377002
Hello! This answer is false. Factors like age, occupation, and lifestyle play an important role on someone's buying behavior. It could affect how much they buy, what they buy, and how much they could buy. Everyone is different. It all depends on the person.
the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
